Object files across eye movements: Previous fixations affect the latencies of corrective saccades

One of the factors contributing to a seamless visual experience is object correspondence—that is, the integration of pre- and postsaccadic visual object information into one representation. Previous research had suggested that before the execution of a saccade, a target object is loaded into visual working memory and subsequently is used to locate the target object after the saccade. Until now, studies on object correspondence have not taken previous fixations into account. In the present study, we investigated the influence of previously fixated information on object correspondence. To this end, we adapted a gaze correction paradigm in which a saccade was executed toward either a previously fixated or a novel target. During the saccade, the stimuli were displaced such that the participant’s gaze landed between the target stimulus and a distractor. Participants then executed a corrective saccade to the target. The results indicated that these corrective saccades had lower latencies toward previously fixated than toward nonfixated targets, indicating object-specific facilitation. In two follow-up experiments, we showed that presaccadic spatial and object (surface feature) information can contribute separately to the execution of a corrective saccade, as well as in conjunction. Whereas the execution of a corrective saccade to a previously fixated target object at a previously fixated location is slowed down (i.e., inhibition of return), corrective saccades toward either a previously fixated target object or a previously fixated location are facilitated. We concluded that corrective saccades are executed on the basis of object files rather than of unintegrated feature information.

[1]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  An animal model of disengagement: Temporary inactivation of the superior colliculus impairs attention disengagement in rats , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Su-Ling Yeh,et al.  Location- and Object-Based Inhibition of Return are Affected by Different Kinds of Working Memory , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[7]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Arvid Herwig,et al.  Transsaccadic integration and perceptual continuity. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[10]  J. Meere The role of attention. , 2002 .

[11]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Tal Makovski,et al.  The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  S. Nishida,et al.  Human Visual System Integrates Color Signals along a Motion Trajectory , 2007, Current Biology.

[16]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. 3. Cells discharging before eye movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[18]  Xiaogang Yan,et al.  Continuous Updating of Visuospatial Memory in Superior Colliculus during Slow Eye Movements , 2015, Current Biology.

[19]  B. Bridgeman A review of the role of efference copy in sensory and oculomotor control systems , 1995, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M D Anes,et al.  Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  D. Zee,et al.  Revisiting corrective saccades: Role of visual feedback , 2013, Vision Research.

[22]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[24]  S. Vrieze Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). , 2012, Psychological methods.

[25]  R A Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  Contribution of the Primate Superior Colliculus to Inhibition of Return , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  On the causes and effects of inhibition of return , 1998 .

[29]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  The role of surface feature and spatiotemporal continuity in object-based inhibition of return , 2010 .

[31]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Post-saccadic location judgments reveal remapping of saccade targets to non-foveal locations. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Alexander C. Schütz,et al.  Trans-saccadic integration of peripheral and foveal feature information is close to optimal. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[35]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[36]  S. Stigchel,et al.  There is no attentional global effect: Attentional shifts are independent of the saccade endpoint. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[37]  W. Becker Do correction saccades depend exclusively on retinal feedback? A note on the possible role of non-retinal feedback , 1976, Vision Research.

[38]  G. Woodman,et al.  The role of attention in the binding of surface features to locations , 2009, Visual cognition.

[39]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[41]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information , 2008, Cognition.

[42]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Endogenous saccades are preceded by shifts of visual attention: evidence from cross-saccadic priming effects. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[43]  Hakwan Lau,et al.  Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors? , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[44]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  S. van der Stigchel,et al.  Spatial inhibition of return as a function of fixation history, task, and spatial references , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[47]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[48]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[50]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Novelty Is Not Always the Best Policy , 2009, Psychological science.

[51]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  David E. Irwin Robert D. Gordon Eye Movements, Attention and Trans-saccadic Memory , 1998 .

[53]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement , 1996, Vision Research.

[54]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[55]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[56]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[57]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  What is inhibited in inhibition of return? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[59]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Robert H Wurtz,et al.  Saccadic Corollary Discharge Underlies Stable Visual Perception , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[62]  D. E. Irwin Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[63]  L. Marshall,et al.  Evidence for Optimal Integration of Visual Feature Representations across Saccades , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[65]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[66]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[67]  Cathleen M Moore,et al.  Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  Matthew D. Hilchey,et al.  Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Neural correlates , 2023 .

[70]  R. Klein,et al.  Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review , 2010, Vision Research.

[71]  W. Neill,et al.  Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  A. Liddle,et al.  Information criteria for astrophysical model selection , 2007, astro-ph/0701113.

[73]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[74]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[75]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.