Mathieu vs urethral plate tubularization in circumcised Megameatus intact prepuce repair: A prospective randomized comparative study

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare urethral plate tubularization vs Mathieu in circumcised Megameatus intact prepuce (MIP) repair. Many techniques were described for MIP, which account for 5% of hypospadias cases and usually diagnosed at time of, or even after circumcision. Material and methods: Forty-six circumcised MIP cases were prospectively enrolled in this prospective study, which was carried out in April 2017 and March 2020. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group one operated by simple urethral plate tubularization and group two by the Mathieu technique. Hypospadias objective scoring evaluation (HOSE) scores, success rate, operative time, and the need for relaxing incision or scrotal flaps for skin closure were compared. Results: Forty-three circumcised cases (22 in group one and 21 in group two) completed at least 6 months of follow-up. Ages ranged from 12 to 39 months (mean 18.06 ± 6.35) in group one and from 10 to 32 months (mean 19.5 ± 7.14) in group two. There was no significant difference between cases with accepted outcome based on HOSE scores (≥14) of the two groups (P value = .942). Three fistulae and one meatal stenosis were the complications in group one (18.2%). In group two, two patients complicated with fistula (9.5%) (P value = .674). Significant differences were present only in the operative time (P = .001) and in the need of relaxing incision or scrotal skin flaps (P = .012) both were more in group two. Conclusion: Mathieu and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty both are good options for circumcised MIP repair.

[1]  B. Giammusso,et al.  Distal hypospadias repair using the needle point bipolar cutting-coagulation forceps. , 2019, Journal of pediatric urology.

[2]  M. Cendron The Megameatus, Intact Prepuce Variant of Hypospadias: Use of the Inframeatal Vascularized Flap for Surgical Correction , 2018, Front. Pediatr..

[3]  Yinghua Xu,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the perimeatal-based flap and tubularized incised-plate techniques for primary hypospadias repair , 2013, Pediatric Surgery International.

[4]  W. Snodgrass,et al.  Prior circumcision does not complicate repair of hypospadias with an intact prepuce. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[5]  M. Mullerad,et al.  Megameatus intact prepuce hypospadias variant: application of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. , 2005, Urology.

[6]  D. Cass,et al.  HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery , 2001, BJU international.

[7]  S. Docimo Subcutaneous frenulum flap (SCUFF) for iatrogenic or primary megameatus and reoperative hypospadias repair. , 2001, Urology.

[8]  A. Lewis,et al.  The modified pyramid hypospadias procedure: repair of megameatus and deep glanular groove variants. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[9]  J. Duckett,et al.  Technical challenge of the megameatus intact prepuce hypospadias variant: the pyramid procedure. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[10]  M. Kalisch,et al.  The Penile Perception Score: an instrument enabling evaluation by surgeons and patient self-assessment after hypospadias repair. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[11]  A. Pieretti,et al.  Circumcised hypospadias , 2008, Pediatric Surgery International.

[12]  H. Kakizaki,et al.  Surgical repair of anterior hypospadias with fish-mouth meatus and intact prepuce based on anatomical characteristics. , 1998, European urology.

[13]  J. Moscovici,et al.  Traitement des hypospadias antérieurs. Place de la balanoplastie. , 1983 .