Quantification of performance shaping factors (PSFs)’ weightings for human reliability analysis (HRA) of low power and shutdown (LPSD) operations

Abstract Recently, human actions during low power and shutdown (LPSD) operation has been recognized as important contributors to the safe operation of nuclear power plants (NPPs). The features of human actions differ between LPSD operation and full power operation because automatic control may be disabled, most control room annunciation tiles indicate alarmed status, and procedures are prepared with less than sufficiency. The goal of this study is to quantify the weightings of performance shaping factors (PSFs) when performing HRA during LPSD operation. In HRA, PSFs are the conditions under which an operator performs the tasks, and PSFs can increase or decrease the probability of human error. In this study, in order to quantify the weightings of PSFs, a profiling technique was adopted. To this end, human error data were collected from domestic NPP operational experience and the PSFs were investigated for describing each human error datum by using a root cause analysis method. As a result, the probabilities of human errors were provided and the weightings of several single PSF and combined PSFs which affect the probabilities of human errors were quantified when implementing HRA during LPSD operation.

[1]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Study on the identification of main drivers affecting the performance of human operators during low power and shutdown operation , 2016 .

[2]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A framework to estimate task opportunities from the operational experience of domestic nuclear power plants , 2016 .

[3]  Inseok Jang,et al.  A statistical approach to estimating effects of performance shaping factors on human error probabilities of soft controls , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  M L Dourson,et al.  Distribution of Exposure Concentrations and Doses for Constituents of Environmental Tobacco Smoke , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  R. T. Bailey,et al.  Estimation from Zero‐Failure Data , 1997 .

[6]  Timothy A. Wheeler,et al.  Summary of Information Presented at an NRC-Sponsored Low-Power Shutdown Public Workshop, April 27, 1999, Rockville, Maryland , 1999 .

[7]  W. Luckas,et al.  An analysis of operational experience during low power and shutdown and a plan for addressing human reliability assessment issues , 1994 .

[8]  Curtis L. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian method for using simulator data to enhance human error probabilities assigned by existing HRA methods , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A taxonomy of performance influencing factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks , 2003 .

[10]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[11]  Oliver Sträter,et al.  Assessment of human reliability based on evaluation of plant experience: requirements and implementation , 1999 .

[12]  Erasmia Lois,et al.  The use of empirical data sources in HRA , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  The development of a nuclear chemical plant human reliability management approach: HRMS and JHEDI☆ , 1997 .

[14]  Mario Hellmich,et al.  Human error probabilities from operational experience of German nuclear power plants, Part II , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..