The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm

Does Islamic appearance increase aggressive tendencies, and what role does affect play in such responses? In a computer game, participants made rapid decisions to shoot at armed people, some of whom wore Islamic head dress. We predicted and found a significant bias for participants to shoot more at Muslim targets. We also predicted and found that positive mood selectively increased aggressive tendencies towards Muslims, consistent with affect-cognition theories that predict a more top-down, stereotypical processing style in positive mood. In contrast, induced anger increased the propensity to shoot at all targets. The relevance of these results for our understanding of real-life negative reactions towards Muslims is discussed, and the influence of affective states on rapid aggressive responses is considered.

[1]  E. Plant,et al.  The Consequences of Race for Police Officers' Responses to Criminal Suspects , 2005, Psychological science.

[2]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  WEAPONS AS AGGRESSION-ELICITING STIMULI. , 1967 .

[3]  An Unobtrusive Study of Reactions to National Stereotypes in Four European Countries , 1976 .

[4]  J. Forgas.  On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Judd,et al.  Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  C. Judd,et al.  The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. Mackie,et al.  Thinking Straight While Seeing Red , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  S. Coyne,et al.  An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[9]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[10]  G. Lorette.  [Unresolved problems]. , 2003, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[11]  J. Forgas.  Why Don't We Do It in the Road. .. ? Stereotyping and Prejudice in Mundane Situations , 2003 .

[12]  B. Bettencourt,et al.  A meta‐analysis of aggression in the presence of violent cues: Effects of gender differences and aversive provocation , 1997 .

[13]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  C. Judd,et al.  The Influence of Afrocentric Facial Features in Criminal Sentencing , 2004, Psychological science.

[15]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. , 1994 .

[16]  C. Anderson,et al.  Human Aggression , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  J. Archer.  Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[18]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude structure and function. , 1998 .

[19]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[20]  Patrick T. Vargas,et al.  Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation , 2005 .

[21]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) , 2006 .

[22]  James Jaccard,et al.  Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction , 2006 .

[23]  J. Forgas.  When sad is better than happy: Negative affect can improve the quality and effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies , 2007 .

[24]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior , 2006 .