Relation of optimal lead positioning as defined by three-dimensional echocardiography to long-term benefit of cardiac resynchronization.

We sought to define the impact of echocardiographically defined left ventricular (LV) lead position on the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in a serial study using 3-dimensional echocardiography. Fifty-eight consecutive patients (53+/-9 years of age; 37 men) with heart failure were included in the study. Echocardiograms were obtained before CRT, within 7 days after implantation, and at 12+/-2 months of follow-up using a 3-dimensional digital ultrasound scanner (iE33, Philips, Andover, Massachusetts). Analysis of the temporal course of contraction in 16 LV segments was performed offline using a semiautomatic contour tracing software (LV Analysis, TomTec, Unterschleissheim, Germany). Based on the resulting volume/time curves the segment with the latest minimum of systolic volume in each patient was identified preoperatively (segment A). In addition, the temporal difference between the pre- and postoperative (within 7 days) minimum of systolic volume was determined for each segment. The segment with the longest temporal difference was defined to show the greatest effect of CRT. Location of the LV lead tip was assumed to be within this segment (segment B). LV lead position was defined as optimal when segments A and B were equal and as nonoptimal when they were far from each other. Using this definition, 26 patients had a nonoptimal and 32 patients an optimal LV lead position. Before CRT ejection fraction (32+/-4% vs 31+/-6%), LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (242+/-92 vs 246+/-88 ml, 315+/-82 vs 323+/-90 ml), and peak oxygen consumption (14.3+/-1.4 vs 14.6+/-1.5 ml/min/kg) were equal in the 2 groups. At 12+/-2 months of follow-up, patients with an assumed optimal LV lead position showed greater increases of ejection fraction (10+/-2% vs 6+/-3%) and peak oxygen consumption (2.4+/-0.3 vs 1.5+/-0.4 ml/min/kg) and greater decreases of LV end-systolic (32+/-7 vs 21+/-5 ml) and end-diastolic (20+/-7 vs 13+/-6 ml) volumes. In conclusion, correspondence of the segment with the latest preoperative LV contraction with the segment with the greatest effect based on CRT results in a significantly greater benefit of ejection fraction and peak oxygen consumption and a greater improvement in LV remodeling. Thus, there is an optimal LV lead position that should be obtained.

[1]  Angelo Auricchio,et al.  Characterization of Left Ventricular Activation in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block , 2004, Circulation.

[2]  S. Kapetanakis,et al.  Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: A Novel Technique to Quantify Global Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony , 2005, Circulation.

[3]  Chu-Pak Lau,et al.  Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Evidence of Reverse Remodeling and Improved Synchronicity by Simultaneously Delaying Regional Contraction After Biventricular Pacing Therapy in Heart Failure , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  M. Schalij,et al.  QRS Duration and Shortening to Predict Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  J. Deharo,et al.  Multisite Pacing as a Supplemental Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Preliminary Results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  E. Leray,et al.  Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew P. Kramer,et al.  Clinical efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing in heart failure patients stratified by severity of ventricular conduction delay. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  Massimo Santini,et al.  Doppler myocardial imaging to evaluate the effectiveness of pacing sites in patients receiving biventricular pacing. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. DeMets,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  Cardiac Dyssynchrony Analysis Using Circumferential Versus Longitudinal Strain: Implications for Assessing Cardiac Resynchronization , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  Paolo Rizzon,et al.  Ventricular asynchrony predicts a better outcome in patients with chronic heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Stefan Sack,et al.  Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  A. Auricchio,et al.  Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular Doppler indices in patients with congestive heart failure. , 2002, American heart journal.

[16]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Marcus Schreckenberg,et al.  High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  R. Canby,et al.  Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[19]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: ready for routine clinical use? A critical appraisal. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. , 1999, Circulation.

[21]  J. Daubert,et al.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  H Le Breton,et al.  Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failure. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Bristow.  Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) : Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure , 2004 .

[24]  Jeremy N Ruskin,et al.  The coronary venous anatomy: a segmental approach to aid cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  A. Giunta,et al.  Left Ventricular Functional Recovery During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[27]  Peter Søgaard,et al.  Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.