Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics

Models reveal the high carbon mitigation potential of tropical forest regeneration. Regrowth of tropical secondary forests following complete or nearly complete removal of forest vegetation actively stores carbon in aboveground biomass, partially counterbalancing carbon emissions from deforestation, forest degradation, burning of fossil fuels, and other anthropogenic sources. We estimate the age and spatial extent of lowland second-growth forests in the Latin American tropics and model their potential aboveground carbon accumulation over four decades. Our model shows that, in 2008, second-growth forests (1 to 60 years old) covered 2.4 million km2 of land (28.1% of the total study area). Over 40 years, these lands can potentially accumulate a total aboveground carbon stock of 8.48 Pg C (petagrams of carbon) in aboveground biomass via low-cost natural regeneration or assisted regeneration, corresponding to a total CO2 sequestration of 31.09 Pg CO2. This total is equivalent to carbon emissions from fossil fuel use and industrial processes in all of Latin America and the Caribbean from 1993 to 2014. Ten countries account for 95% of this carbon storage potential, led by Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. We model future land-use scenarios to guide national carbon mitigation policies. Permitting natural regeneration on 40% of lowland pastures potentially stores an additional 2.0 Pg C over 40 years. Our study provides information and maps to guide national-level forest-based carbon mitigation plans on the basis of estimated rates of natural regeneration and pasture abandonment. Coupled with avoided deforestation and sustainable forest management, natural regeneration of second-growth forests provides a low-cost mechanism that yields a high carbon sequestration potential with multiple benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services.

[1]  K. Anderson‐Teixeira,et al.  Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC‐db) , 2016, Global change biology.

[2]  C. Nobre,et al.  Land use change emission scenarios: anticipating a forest transition process in the Brazilian Amazon , 2016, Global change biology.

[3]  J. Herbohn,et al.  Tropical secondary forests regenerating after shifting cultivation in the Philippines uplands are important carbon sinks , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  R. Myster Post-agricultural succession in the neotropics , 2016 .

[5]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests , 2016, Nature.

[6]  Robin L. Chazdon,et al.  A trait‐mediated, neighbourhood approach to quantify climate impacts on successional dynamics of tropical rainforests , 2016 .

[7]  Nancy L. Harris,et al.  Mapping Tree Plantations with Multispectral Imagery: Preliminary Results for Seven Tropical Countries , 2016 .

[8]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Degradation in carbon stocks near tropical forest edges , 2015, Nature Communications.

[9]  R. Houghton,et al.  A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO 2 , 2015 .

[10]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Changes in planted forests and future global implications , 2015 .

[11]  C. A. Mücher,et al.  Environmental science: Agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space , 2015, Nature.

[12]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Secondary vegetation in central Amazonia: Land-use history effects on aboveground biomass , 2015 .

[13]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Tropical reforestation and climate change: beyond carbon , 2015 .

[14]  Aditya Singh,et al.  Mapping Species Composition of Forests and Tree Plantations in Northeastern Costa Rica with an Integration of Hyperspectral and Multitemporal Landsat Imagery , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Bernardo B. N. Strassburg,et al.  Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes , 2015 .

[16]  Rick Mueller,et al.  Mapping global cropland and field size , 2015, Global change biology.

[17]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Forest Landscape Restoration as a Key Component of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation , 2015 .

[18]  K. Macdicken,et al.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: how are the world's forests changing? , 2015 .

[19]  M. Herold,et al.  Why Maintaining Tropical Forests is Essential and Urgent for a Stable Climate , 2014 .

[20]  B. Nelson,et al.  Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees , 2014, Global change biology.

[21]  L. G. Barioni,et al.  When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil , 2014 .

[22]  J. Barlow,et al.  Challenges of governing second-growth forests:a case study from the Brazilian Amazonian State of Para , 2014 .

[23]  R. Chazdon Second growth : the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation , 2014 .

[24]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Cracking Brazil's Forest Code , 2014, Science.

[25]  B. Reyers,et al.  Spatial optimization of carbon-stocking projects across Africa integrating stocking potential with co-benefits and feasibility , 2013, Nature Communications.

[26]  Jefferson S. Hall,et al.  Succession of Ephemeral Secondary Forests and Their Limited Role for the Conservation of Floristic Diversity in a Human-Modified Tropical Landscape , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[28]  M. Clark,et al.  Deforestation and Reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010) , 2013 .

[29]  S. Wright The carbon sink in intact tropical forests. , 2013, Global change biology.

[30]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[31]  J. Hernández‐Stefanoni,et al.  Predicting Tropical Dry Forest Successional Attributes from Space: Is the Key Hidden in Image Texture? , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Frédéric Achard,et al.  Global Forest Monitoring from Earth Observation , 2012 .

[33]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[34]  E. Veldkamp,et al.  Geographic bias of field observations of soil carbon stocks with tropical land-use changes precludes spatial extrapolation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Friedl,et al.  Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: new methods and datasets based on 'urban ecoregions'. , 2010 .

[36]  M. Friedl,et al.  A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data , 2009 .

[37]  D. Civco,et al.  Mapping urban areas on a global scale: which of the eight maps now available is more accurate? , 2009 .

[38]  J. Canadell,et al.  Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation , 2008, Science.

[39]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[40]  W. Silver,et al.  Trends in Above and Belowground Carbon with Forest Regrowth After Agricultural Abandonment in the Neotropics , 2008 .

[41]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database , 2007 .

[42]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[43]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[44]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands , 2004 .

[45]  M. Steininger NET CARBON FLUXES FROM FOREST CLEARANCE AND REGROWTH IN THE AMAZON , 2004 .

[46]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[47]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report: A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[48]  Wu Leung,et al.  Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. , 1962 .

[49]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .