Probability, danger, and coercion

[1]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[2]  Billie Jo Hance,et al.  Improving Risk Communication in Government: Research Priorities , 1995 .

[3]  J. Merz,et al.  How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients’ interpretations of verbal probability terms , 1994, Journal of general internal medicine.

[4]  G. Gigerenzer.  Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa). , 1994 .

[5]  John Monahan,et al.  Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. , 1994 .

[6]  T. R. Litwack.  On the ethics of dangerousness assessments , 1993, Law and human behavior.

[7]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  Structuring the debate about ethical predictions of future violence , 1993, Law and human behavior.

[8]  A. Rogers.  Coercion and 'voluntary' admission: An examination of psychiatric patient views , 1993 .

[9]  J. Monahan,et al.  Patient, family, and staff perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission: an exploratory study. , 1993, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[10]  J. Monahan,et al.  Inclusion, motivation, and good faith: the morality of coercion in mental hospital admission. , 1993, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[11]  E. Mulvey,et al.  The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. , 1993, JAMA.

[12]  Paul S Appelbaum,et al.  Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence? , 1992, Law and human behavior.

[13]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[14]  D. Wexler,et al.  Essays in Therapeutic Jurisprudence , 1991 .

[15]  Robert M. Hamm,et al.  Selection of verbal probabilities: A solution for some problems of verbal probability expression. , 1991 .

[16]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-Protective Behavior. , 1989 .

[17]  J. Monahan,et al.  Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States. , 1989, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[18]  P. Appelbaum.  The new preventive detention: psychiatry's problematic responsibility for the control of violence. , 1988, The American journal of psychiatry.

[19]  D. Klassen,et al.  A prospective study of predictors of violence in adult male mental health admissions , 1988 .

[20]  D. Mcniel,et al.  Effects of diagnosis and context on dangerousness. , 1988, The American journal of psychiatry.

[21]  L. Lunsky.  The Mentally Disabled and the Law , 1987 .

[22]  D. Krantz,et al.  The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  B. Weiner,et al.  The mentally disabled and the law , 1986 .

[24]  Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment. , 1986, Mental and physical disability law reporter.

[25]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk , 1982 .

[26]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Training for calibration. , 1980 .

[27]  J. Monahan,et al.  A definite maybe: Proof and probability in civil commitment , 1978 .

[28]  Gilbert F. White,et al.  Natural Hazards, Local, National, Global , 1976 .

[29]  James Lewis,et al.  Natural Hazards - Local, National and Global , 1976 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[31]  G. F. White,et al.  Decision processes, rationality and adjustment to natural hazards , 1974 .

[32]  P. Slovic,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  R L Stubblefield,et al.  Behavioral sciences and the law. , 1966, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[34]  L. Guttman.  A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .