Regionalized Life-Cycle Water Impacts of Microalgal-Based Biofuels in the United States.

While algal biofuels have the potential to reduce the national reliance on fossil fuels, high water consumption associated with algal biomass cultivation represents a major concern potentially compromising the sustainable commercialization of this technology. This study focuses on quantifying the water footprint (WF) and water scarcity footprint (WSF) of renewable diesel derived from algal biomass and provides insights into where algal cultivation is less water-intensive than traditional ethanol and biodiesel feedstocks. Results are generated with an engineering process model developed to predict the life-cycle water consumption, considering green, blue, and gray water, of algae facilities across the United States at a high spatiotemporal resolution. The total WFs for Florida and Arizona are determined to be 13.1 and 17.6 m3 GJ-1, respectively. The blue WF in Arizona is shown to be 8.5 times larger than in Florida, while the green WF is 4.5 times smaller, but when combined into a total WF, there is just a 26% difference between the two locations. The analysis reveals that the total life-cycle WFs of algal renewable diesel are smaller than the optimal WFs of corn ethanol and soybean biodiesel. Algal systems benefit from higher growth rates and offer the opportunity to manage wastewater streams, therefore generating smaller green and gray WFs than those of conventional biofuels. The WSF analysis identifies the Gulf Coast as the most suitable region for algal cultivation, with cultivation in the western US shown to exacerbate local water stress levels.

[1]  Jason C. Quinn,et al.  A validated thermal and biological model for predicting algal productivity in large scale outdoor cultivation systems , 2021 .

[2]  Jason C. Quinn,et al.  Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments , 2021 .

[3]  A. Nizami,et al.  A state of the art review on the cultivation of algae for energy and other valuable products: Application, challenges, and opportunities , 2021 .

[4]  Timothy J. Skone,et al.  Regional and seasonal water stress analysis of United States thermoelectricity , 2020 .

[5]  Ryan Davis,et al.  Algal Biomass Production via Open Pond Algae Farm Cultivation: 2020 State of Technology and Future Research , 2020 .

[6]  A. P. Williams,et al.  Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought , 2020, Science.

[7]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Balancing water sustainability and productivity objectives in microalgae cultivation: Siting open ponds by considering seasonal water-stress impact using AWARE-US. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  The CHRS Data Portal, an easily accessible public repository for PERSIANN global satellite precipitation data , 2019, Scientific Data.

[9]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  AWARE-US: Quantifying water stress impacts of energy systems in the United States. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Steyer,et al.  Comparative assessment of evaporation models in algal ponds , 2018, Algal Research.

[11]  Michael J. Lathuillière,et al.  The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE) , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Q. Béchet,et al.  Maximizing Productivity and Reducing Environmental Impacts of Full-Scale Algal Production through Optimization of Open Pond Depth and Hydraulic Retention Time. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Eric C. D. Tan,et al.  Process Design and Economics for the Production of Algal Biomass: Algal Biomass Production in Open Pond Systems and Processing Through Dewatering for Downstream Conversion , 2016 .

[14]  A. Inaba,et al.  Consensus building on the development of a stress-based indicator for LCA-based impact assessment of water consumption: outcome of the expert workshops , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  S. Harrison,et al.  The effect of nitrogen limitation on lipid productivity and cell composition in Chlorella vulgaris , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Geographical Assessment of Microalgae Biofuels Potential Incorporating Resource Availability , 2013, BioEnergy Research.

[17]  Yi-Wen Chiu,et al.  Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Quantitative measurement of direct nitrous oxide emissions from microalgae cultivation. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Benoit Guieysse,et al.  Variability and uncertainty in water demand and water footprint assessments of fresh algae cultivation based on case studies from five climatic regions. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Q. Hu,et al.  Life-cycle analysis on biodiesel production from microalgae: water footprint and nutrients balance. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Mark A. White,et al.  Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.