A review of setup error in supine breast radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography.

Setup error in breast radiotherapy (RT) measured with 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is becoming more common. The purpose of this study is to review the literature relating to the magnitude of setup error in breast RT measured with CBCT. The different methods of image registration between CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) scan were also explored. A literature search, not limited by date, was conducted using Medline and Google Scholar with the following key words: breast cancer, RT, setup error, and CBCT. This review includes studies that reported on systematic and random errors, and the methods used when registering CBCT scans with planning CT scan. A total of 11 relevant studies were identified for inclusion in this review. The average magnitude of error is generally less than 5mm across a number of studies reviewed. The common registration methods used when registering CBCT scans with planning CT scan are based on bony anatomy, soft tissue, and surgical clips. No clear relationships between the setup errors detected and methods of registration were observed from this review. Further studies are needed to assess the benefit of CBCT over electronic portal image, as CBCT remains unproven to be of wide benefit in breast RT.

[1]  M. Barton,et al.  An evidence-based estimation of local control and survival benefit of radiotherapy for breast cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  C. Hess,et al.  Accuracy of alignment in breast irradiation: a retrospective analysis of clinical practice. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  P. Evans,et al.  Second cancer incidence risk estimates using BEIR VII models for standard and complex external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Assessment of the residual error in soft tissue setup in patients undergoing partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective study using cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Surgical clips for position verification and correction of non-rigid breast tissue in simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) treatments. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  J. Sonke,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients: surgical clips as surrogate for breast excision cavity. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  Accuracy in tangential breast treatment set-up: a portal imaging study. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  A Dutreix,et al.  Tangential breast irradiation: influence of technique of set-up on transfer errors and reproducibility. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  D. Yan,et al.  The validity of surgical clips as a radiographic surrogate for the lumpectomy cavity in image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L. Holloway,et al.  Imaging dose in breast radiotherapy: does breast size affect the dose to the organs at risk and the risk of secondary cancer to the contralateral breast? , 2015, Journal of medical radiation sciences.

[11]  M. Barton,et al.  Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for melanoma , 2003 .

[12]  D. Yan,et al.  On-line localization of the lumpectomy cavity using surgical clips. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  W. Tomé,et al.  Normal tissue dose and second cancer risk due to megavoltage fan-beam CT, static tomotherapy and helical tomotherapy in breast radiotherapy. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  R. Harrison,et al.  Doses to critical organs following radiotherapy and concomitant imaging of the larynx and breast. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  J Pouliot,et al.  The role of electronic portal imaging in tangential breast irradiation: a prospective study. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography setup measurements for lung cancer patients; first clinical results and comparison with electronic portal-imaging device. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Philip M Evans,et al.  A randomised trial of supine versus prone breast radiotherapy (SuPr study): comparing set-up errors and respiratory motion. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  S Webb,et al.  The dosimetric consequences of inter-fractional patient movement on conventional and intensity-modulated breast radiotherapy treatments. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  D. Low,et al.  Dosimetric consequences of uncorrected setup errors in helical Tomotherapy treatments of breast-cancer patients. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  H. Mccallum,et al.  Dosimetric effects of setup uncertainties on breast treatment delivery. , 2008, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[22]  Yi-Jen Chen,et al.  Setup variations in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer: evaluation by daily megavoltage computed tomographic localization. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Christopher Moore,et al.  Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  E. Yu,et al.  Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-fraction Motion in Breast Radiotherapy Using Electronic Portal Cine Imaging , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[25]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  F. Koseoglu,et al.  Assessment of setup accuracy in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging , 2007, Radiation Medicine.

[27]  J. Bachaud,et al.  Cost of prostate image-guided radiation therapy: results of a randomized trial. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  K. Ruchala,et al.  Patient dose from megavoltage computed tomography imaging. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  M. Barton,et al.  Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[31]  T. Rosewall,et al.  Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  Influence of a vac-fix immobilization device on the accuracy of patient positioning during routine breast radiotherapy. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[33]  Alternated prone and supine whole-breast irradiation using IMRT: setup precision, respiratory movement and treatment time. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  R. Chaudhary,et al.  The CT appearances of gallbladder perforation. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  G. Son,et al.  Set-up uncertainty during breast radiotherapy , 2013, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[36]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Effects of setup errors and shape changes on breast radiotherapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  Marianne Rinks,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐fraction motion during radiation therapy to the whole breast in the supine position: A systematic review , 2012, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[38]  Early breast cancer irradiation after conservative surgery: quality control by portal localization films. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  Reproducibility of tangential breast fields using online electronic portal images , 2007 .

[40]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Intra- and interfractional reproducibility of tangential breast fields: a prospective on-line portal imaging study. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[41]  A. Hanlon,et al.  The value of setup portal films as an estimate of a patient's position throughout fractionated tangential breast irradiation: an on-line study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Breast-conserving therapy: radiotherapy margins for breast tumor bed boost. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  M. Lamba,et al.  Effect of breast volume on treatment reproducibility on a tomotherapy unit in the treatment of breast cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  P. Remeijer,et al.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[45]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy is being overvalued as a clinical tool in radiation oncology. , 2006, Medical physics.