AMR, stability and higher accuracy

Efforts to achieve better accuracy in numerical relativity have so far focused either on implementing second-order accurate adaptive mesh refinement or on defining higher order accurate differences and update schemes. Here, we argue for the combination, that is a higher order accurate adaptive scheme. This combines the power that adaptive gridding techniques provide to resolve fine scales (in addition to a more efficient use of resources) together with the higher accuracy furnished by higher order schemes when the solution is adequately resolved. To define a convenient higher order adaptive mesh refinement scheme, we discuss a few different modifications of the standard, second-order accurate approach of Berger and Oliger. Applying each of these methods to a simple model problem, we find these options have unstable modes. However, a novel approach to dealing with the grid boundaries introduced by the adaptivity appears stable and quite promising for the use of high order operators within an adaptive framework.

[1]  Oscar Reula,et al.  Summation by parts and dissipation for domains with excised regions , 2003, gr-qc/0308007.

[2]  Joseph Oliger,et al.  Stability and error estimation for component adaptive grid methods , 1996 .

[3]  Erik Schnetter,et al.  Computational relativistic astrophysics with adaptive mesh refinement: Testbeds , 2005 .

[4]  Accuracy requirements for the calculation of gravitational waveforms from coalescing compact binaries in numerical relativity , 2005, gr-qc/0502087.

[5]  Frans Pretorius,et al.  Numerical relativity using a generalized harmonic decomposition , 2005 .

[6]  Adaptive mesh refinement for characteristic codes , 2003, gr-qc/0302003.

[7]  H. Kreiss,et al.  Time-Dependent Problems and Difference Methods , 1996 .

[8]  M. Choptuik,et al.  Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[9]  M. Berger,et al.  Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations , 1982 .

[10]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes , 1994 .

[11]  Constraint-preserving boundary conditions in numerical relativity , 2001, gr-qc/0111003.

[12]  Marsha Berger,et al.  Stability of interfaces with mesh refinement , 1985 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  Black hole evolution by spectral methods , 2000, gr-qc/0005056.

[14]  L. Jameson AMR vs High Order Schemes Wavelets as a Guide , 2000 .

[15]  David Neilsen,et al.  The discrete energy method in numerical relativity: Towards long-term stability , 2004, gr-qc/0406116.

[16]  Pelle Olsson Supplement to Summation by Parts, Projections, and Stability. I , 1995 .

[17]  Scott H. Hawley,et al.  Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement , 2003, gr-qc/0310042.

[18]  ScienceDirect,et al.  Applied numerical mathematics , 1985 .

[19]  H. Najm,et al.  High-order spatial discretizations and extended stability methods for reacting flows on structured adaptively refined meshes , 2022 .

[20]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[21]  Threshold of singularity formation in the semilinear wave equation , 2005, gr-qc/0502056.

[22]  H. Kreiss,et al.  Modeling the black hole excision problem , 2004, gr-qc/0412101.

[23]  M. Campanelli,et al.  Accurate black hole evolutions by fourth-order numerical relativity , 2005 .

[24]  Oscar Reula,et al.  Multi-block simulations in general relativity: high-order discretizations, numerical stability and applications , 2005, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[25]  P. Olsson Summation by parts, projections, and stability. II , 1995 .

[26]  J. Thornburg Black-hole excision with multiple grid patches , 2004, gr-qc/0404059.

[27]  C. Caldwell Mathematics of Computation , 1999 .

[28]  E. Schnetter,et al.  Black hole head-on collisions and gravitational waves with fixed mesh-refinement and dynamic singularity excision , 2005 .

[30]  R. Stouffer,et al.  World Meteorological Organization , 1954, International Organization.

[31]  Wolfgang Tichy,et al.  Numerical simulation of orbiting black holes. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[32]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy , 1999 .

[33]  3D simulations of Einstein's equations: Symmetric hyperbolicity, live gauges, and dynamic control of the constraints , 2003, gr-qc/0312001.