Implementation and design of a service-based framework to integrate personal and institutional learning environments

The landscape of teaching and learning has changed in recent years because of the application of Information and Communications technology. Among the most representative innovations in this regard are Learning Management Systems. Despite of their popularity in institutional contexts and the wide set of tools and services that they provide to learners and teachers, they present several issues. Learning Management Systems are linked to an institution and a period of time, and are not adapted to learners' needs. In order to address these problems Personal Learning Environments are defined, but it is clear that these will not replace Learning Management Systems and other institutional contexts. Both types of environment should therefore coexist and interact. This paper presents a service-based framework to facilitate such interoperability. It supports the export of functionalities from the institutional to the personal environment and also the integration within the institution of learning outcomes from personal activities. In order to achieve this in a flexible, extensible and open way, web services and interoperability specifications are used. In addition some interoperability scenarios are posed. The framework has been tested in real learning contexts and the results show that interoperability is possible, and that it benefits learners, teachers and institutions.

[1]  Eran Hammer-Lahav,et al.  The OAuth 1.0 Protocol , 2010, RFC.

[2]  Santiago Nieto Martín,et al.  Investigación y conocimiento científico en educación , 2009 .

[3]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  SOA Initiatives for eLearning: A Moodle Case , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[4]  Carlos Alario-Hoyos,et al.  Comparison of the main alternatives to the integration of external tools in different platforms. , 2010 .

[5]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interoperability in eLearning Contexts. Interaction between LMS and PLE , 2012, SLATE 2012.

[6]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Software Development with SCRUM , 2001 .

[7]  Niall Sclater,et al.  Web 2.0, personal learning environments and the future of learning management systems , 2008 .

[8]  C. Chadwick Computadoras en la educación: problemas y precauciones , 2008 .

[9]  Brian L. Hawkins,et al.  EDUCAUSE Core Data Service: Fiscal Year 2005 Summary Report. , 2006 .

[10]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interoperability Scenarios to Measure Informal Learning Carried Out in PLEs , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[11]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  Mª Paz,et al.  Plataformas de Campus Virtual con herramientas de Software Libre: Análisis comparativo de la situación actual en las universidades españolas. , 2009 .

[13]  Palitha Edirisingha,et al.  BUILDING WEB 2.0-BASED PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS - A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2008 .

[14]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[15]  Stephen Downes E-learning 2.0 , 2005, ELERN.

[16]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Informal learning in work environments: training with the Social Web in the workplace , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Paris Avgeriou,et al.  Towards a Pattern Language for Learning Management Systems , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Experimental And Quasi Experimental Designs For Research , 2016 .

[19]  David Wiley,et al.  Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network , 2009 .

[20]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Project Management with Scrum , 1980 .

[21]  Dai Griffiths,et al.  Distributing education services to personal and institutional systems using Widgets , 2008 .

[22]  Bernice W. Polemis Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[23]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Graham Attwell,et al.  E-portfolio: the DNa of the Personal Learning Environment? , 2007 .

[25]  M. van Harmelen Personal Learning Environments , 2006 .

[26]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Mashups in Learning Design: pushing the flexibility envelope , 2008 .

[27]  Linda Johanna Castañeda Quintero,et al.  La anatomía de los PLEs , 2013 .

[28]  J. B. Vancouver,et al.  The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Stefaan Ternier,et al.  Personalisation of Learning in Virtual Learning Environments , 2009, EC-TEL.

[30]  A. Bandura,et al.  Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Docs4Learning: Getting Google Docs to work within the LMS with IMS BLTI , 2012, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[32]  M. Angel,et al.  Personalización del aprendizaje: Framework de servicios para la integración de aplicaciones online en los sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje , 2012 .

[33]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Opening Learning Management Systems to Personal Learning Environments , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[34]  Yvan Peter,et al.  First steps in the integration of institutional and personal learning environments , 2010 .

[35]  Richard Walker,et al.  2008 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK , 2008 .

[36]  Ana García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso,et al.  Medida de actitudes del profesorado universitario hacia la integración de las TIC , 2009 .

[37]  Fuensanta Monroy Hernández,et al.  Aprendizaje y competencias. Una nueva mirada. , 2014 .

[38]  Jason Cole Using moodle , 2005 .

[39]  Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez,et al.  Integration of External Tools in Virtual Learning Environments: Main Design Issues and Alternatives , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[40]  Andrew G. Booth,et al.  A service‐oriented virtual learning environment , 2009 .

[41]  O. Casquero,et al.  iGoogle and gadgets as a platform for integrating institutional and external services , 2008 .