Preliminary Quantitative Assessment of Earthquake Casualties and Damages

Prognostic estimations of the expected number of killed or injured people and about the approximate cost associated with the damages caused by earthquakes are made following a suitable methodology of wide-ranging application. For the preliminary assessment of human life losses due to the occurrence of a relatively strong earthquake we use a quantitative model consisting of a correlation between the number of casualties and the earthquake magnitude as a function of population density. The macroseismic intensity field is determined in accordance with an updated anelastic attenuation law, and the number of casualties within areas of different intensity is computed using an application developed in a geographic information system (GIS) environment, taking advantage of the possibilities of such a system for the treatment of space-distributed data. The casualty rate, defined as the number of killed people divided by the number of inhabitants of the affected region, is also computed and we show its variation for some urban concentrations with different population density. For a rough preliminary evaluation of the direct economic cost derived from the damages, equally through a GIS-based tool, we take into account the local social wealth as a function of the gross domestic product of the country. This last step is performed on the basis of the relationship of the macroseismic intensity to the earthquake economic loss in percentage of the wealth. Such an approach to the human casualty and damage levels is carried out for sites near important cities located in a seismically active zone of Spain, thus contributing to an easier taking of decisions in emergency preparedness planning, contemporary earthquake engineering and seismic risk prevention.

[1]  Y Ohta,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL CONSTRUCTION OF EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATING NUMBER OF VICTIMS AT AN EARTHQUAKE , 1983 .

[2]  J. Badal,et al.  Moment Magnitudes for Early (1923–1961) Instrumental Iberian Earthquakes , 2000 .

[3]  Indra N. Gupta,et al.  Spatial attenuation of intensities for central U.S. earthquakes , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  U. Chandra,et al.  Attenuation of intensities and effect of local site conditions on observed intensities during the Corinth, Greece, earthquakes of 24 and 25 February and 4 March 1981 , 1985 .

[5]  F. Perotti,et al.  Macroseismic intensity versus epicentral distance: the case of Central Italy , 1991 .

[6]  Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al.  Attenuation of intensity with epicentral distance in the Philippines , 1980 .

[7]  U. Chandra,et al.  Attenuation of intensities in the United States , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  J. F. Delgado,et al.  Attenuation of Intensity with Epicentral Distance in the Iberian Peninsula , 2000 .

[9]  MODELLING THE NUMBER OF CASUALTIES FROM EARTHQUAKES , 1992 .

[10]  Magnitude Formulae and Intensity–Magnitude Relations for Early Instrumental Earthquakes in the Iberian Region , 1999 .

[11]  Kaye M. Shedlock,et al.  The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map , 1999 .

[12]  U. Chandra,et al.  Attenuation of intensities in Iran , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  Agustín Udías,et al.  Principles of Seismology , 2000 .

[14]  B. N. Margaris,et al.  Regionalization of seismic hazard in Greece based on seismic sources , 1993 .

[15]  N. N. Ambraseys,et al.  Intensity‐attenuation and magnitude‐intensity relationships for northwest european earthquakes , 1985 .

[16]  José Badal,et al.  Estimation of the Expected Number of Casualties Caused by Strong Earthquakes , 2002 .

[17]  J. J. Giner,et al.  Magnitude-Intensity Relationships in the Ibero-Magrebhian Region , 2000 .

[18]  Qi-fu Chen,et al.  Quick and Approximate Estimation of Earthquake Loss Based on Macroscopic Index of Exposure and Population Distribution , 1997 .

[19]  Kaye M. Shedlock,et al.  The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map , 2000 .

[20]  John G. Anderson.  On the attenuation of Modified Mercalli Intensity with distance in the United States , 1978 .

[21]  L. Hoadley.  VISCOSITY CHANGES DURING EARLY CLEAVAGE STAGES OF FUNDULUS EGGS. , 1928, Science.

[22]  Roger M.W. Musson,et al.  Seismic hazard maps for the U.K. , 1996 .