The goal of this project undertaken by GLBRC (Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center) Area 4 (Sustainability) modelers is to develop a national capability to model feedstock supply, ethanol production, and biogeochemical impacts of cellulosic biofuels. The results of this project contribute to sustainability goals of the GLBRC; i.e. to contribute to developing a sustainable bioenergy economy: one that is profitable to farmers and refiners, acceptable to society, and environmentally sound. A sustainable bioenergy economy will also contribute, in a fundamental way, to meeting national objectives on energy security and climate mitigation. The specific objectives of this study are to: (1) develop a spatially explicit national geodatabase for conducting biofuel simulation studies and (4) locate possible sites for the establishment of cellulosic ethanol biorefineries. To address the first objective, we developed SENGBEM (Spatially Explicit National Geodatabase for Biofuel and Environmental Modeling), a 60-m resolution geodatabase of the conterminous USA containing data on: (1) climate, (2) soils, (3) topography, (4) hydrography, (5) land cover/ land use (LCLU), and (6) ancillary data (e.g., road networks, federal and state lands, national and state parks, etc.). A unique feature of SENGBEM is its 2008-2010 crop rotation data, a crucially important component for simulating productivity andmore » biogeochemical cycles as well as land-use changes associated with biofuel cropping. ARRA support for this project and to the PNNL Joint Global Change Research Institute enabled us to create an advanced computing infrastructure to execute millions of simulations, conduct post-processing calculations, store input and output data, and visualize results. These computing resources included two components installed at the Research Data Center of the University of Maryland. The first resource was 'deltac': an 8-core Linux server, dedicated to county-level and state-level simulations and PostgreSQL database hosting. The second resource was the DOE-JGCRI 'Evergreen' cluster, capable of executing millions of simulations in relatively short periods. ARRA funding also supported a PhD student from UMD who worked on creating the geodatabases and executing some of the simulations in this study. Using a physically based classification of marginal lands, we simulated production of cellulosic feedstocks from perennial mixtures grown on these lands in the US Midwest. Marginal lands in the western states of the US Midwest appear to have significant potential to supply feedstocks to a cellulosic biofuel industry. Similar results were obtained with simulations of N-fertilized perennial mixtures. A detailed spatial analysis allowed for the identification of possible locations for the establishment of 34 cellulosic ethanol biorefineries with an annual production capacity of 5.6 billion gallons. In summary, we have reported on the development of a spatially explicit national geodatabase to conduct biofuel simulation studies and provided simulation results on the potential of perennial cropping systems to serve as feedstocks for the production of cellulosic ethanol. To accomplish this, we have employed sophisticated spatial analysis methods in combination with the process-based biogeochemical model EPIC. The results of this study will be submitted to the USDOE Bioenergy Knowledge Discovery Framework as a way to contribute to the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry. This work provided the opportunity to test the hypothesis that marginal lands can serve as sources of cellulosic feedstocks and thus contribute to avoid potential conflicts between bioenergy and food production systems. This work, we believe, opens the door for further analysis on the characteristics of cellulosic feedstocks as major contributors to the development of a sustainable bioenergy economy.« less
[1]
B. Dale,et al.
Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues
,
2004
.
[2]
John R. Williams,et al.
The EPIC crop growth model
,
1989
.
[3]
David C. Gosselin,et al.
HYDROLOGICAL EFFECTS AND GROUNDWATER FLUCTUATIONS IN INTERDUNAL ENVIRONMENTS IN THE NEBRASKA SANDHILLS
,
2006
.
[4]
V. Singh,et al.
The EPIC model.
,
1995
.
[5]
Xuesong Zhang,et al.
Biomass supply from alternative cellulosic crops and crop residues: A spatially explicit bioeconomic modeling approach
,
2011
.
[6]
Jimmy R. Williams,et al.
Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data
,
2006
.
[7]
Comment on "Modeling miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop".
,
2011,
Environmental science & technology.
[8]
Keith A. Smith,et al.
N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels
,
2007
.
[9]
Thomas A. Hennig,et al.
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
,
2001,
Digital Earth Moving.
[10]
R. C. Izaurralde,et al.
Epic Model Parameters for Cereal, Oilseed, and Forage Crops in the Northern Great Plains Region
,
1995
.
[11]
J. Melillo,et al.
Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important?
,
2009,
Science.
[12]
D. Wedin,et al.
Ecophysiology of Two Native Invasive Woody Species and Two Dominant Warm‐Season Grasses in the Semiarid Grasslands of the Nebraska Sandhills
,
2006,
International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[13]
S. Polasky,et al.
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
,
2008,
Science.
[14]
J. Monteith.
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
,
1977
.
[15]
Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
,
2008,
Science.
[16]
Paul T. Dyke,et al.
EPIC: An operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability
,
1991
.
[17]
Richard M. Cruse,et al.
Sustainable Biofuels Redux
,
2008,
Science.
[18]
T. Donohue,et al.
The US Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center: Midwestern Biomass as a Resource for Renewable Fuels
,
2010,
BioEnergy Research.
[19]
R. C. Izaurralde,et al.
Historical Development and Applications of the EPIC and APEX Models
,
2004
.
[20]
John R. Williams,et al.
Development and application of the EPIC model for carbon cycle, greenhouse-gas mitigation, and biofuel studies
,
2012
.
[21]
Şermin Tağil,et al.
GIS-Based Automated Landform Classification and Topographic, Landcover and Geologic Attributes of Landforms Around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey
,
2008
.
[22]
Jimmy R. Williams,et al.
An integrative modeling framework to evaluate the productivity and sustainability of biofuel crop production systems
,
2010
.
[23]
Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.
A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: Part II—Sensitivity analysis at three sites in the Midwestern USA
,
1992
.
[24]
Edoardo Costantini,et al.
The Land Capability Classification
,
2009
.
[25]
D. F. Grigal,et al.
Carbon and nitrogen cycling during old-field succession: Constraints on plant and microbial biomass
,
1990
.
[26]
William J. Carswell,et al.
The National Map - Hydrography
,
2009
.