Predicting community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity.

How best to predict the effects of perturbations to ecological communities has been a long-standing goal for both applied and basic ecology. This quest has recently been revived by new empirical data, new analysis methods, and increased computing speed, with the promise that ecologically important insights may be obtainable from a limited knowledge of community interactions. We use empirically based and simulated networks of varying size and connectance to assess two limitations to predicting perturbation responses in multispecies communities: (1) the inaccuracy by which species interaction strengths are empirically quantified and (2) the indeterminacy of species responses due to indirect effects associated with network size and structure. We find that even modest levels of species richness and connectance (-25 pairwise interactions) impose high requirements for interaction strength estimates because system indeterminacy rapidly overwhelms predictive insights. Nevertheless, even poorly estimated interaction strengths provide greater average predictive certainty than an approach that uses only the sign of each interaction. Our simulations provide guidance in dealing with the trade-offs involved in maximizing the utility of network approaches for predicting dynamics in multispecies communities.

[1]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  James Justus,et al.  Qualitative Scientific Modeling and Loop Analysis , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[4]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Stabilization of chaotic and non-permanent food-web dynamics , 2004 .

[5]  P. Yodzis,et al.  In search of operational trophospecies in a tropical aquatic food web , 1999 .

[6]  Elizabeth T. Borer,et al.  Topological approaches to food web analyses: a few modifications may improve our insights , 2002 .

[7]  R Levins,et al.  DISCUSSION PAPER: THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTIALLY SPECIFIED SYSTEMS , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[9]  Eoin J. O’Gorman,et al.  Perturbations to trophic interactions and the stability of complex food webs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Yimin Ye,et al.  Rebuilding global fisheries: the World Summit Goal, costs and benefits , 2013 .

[11]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[12]  S. Opitz,et al.  Trophic interactions in Caribbean coral reefs , 1996 .

[13]  Jeffrey M. Dambacher,et al.  Qualitative predictions in model ecosystems , 2003 .

[14]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLING EFFORT ON CHARACTERIZATION OF FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE , 1999 .

[15]  E. Berlow,et al.  Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  W. Schaffer.  ECOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION: THE CONSEQUENCES OF REDUCED DIMENSIONALITY IN ECOLOGICAL MODELS' , 1981 .

[17]  R. Ulanowicz,et al.  The Seasonal Dynamics of The Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem , 1989 .

[18]  L. Stone,et al.  Conditions for a Species to Gain Advantage from the Presence of Competitors , 1991 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Dambacher,et al.  RELEVANCE OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN ASSESSING INDETERMINACY OF ECOLOGICAL PREDICTIONS , 2002 .

[20]  J. Wootton,et al.  ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .

[21]  S. Hall,et al.  Food-web patterns : lessons from a species-rich web , 1991 .

[22]  Robert R. Christian,et al.  Organizing and understanding a winter's seagrass foodweb network through effective trophic levels , 1999 .

[23]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Robust Analysis of Aggregation Error , 1982 .

[24]  Neo D. Martinez.  Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web , 1991 .

[25]  Charles J. Puccia,et al.  Qualitative Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction to Loop Analysis and Time Averaging , 1986 .

[26]  Mark Novak,et al.  Estimating interaction strengths in nature: experimental support for an observational approach. , 2010, Ecology.

[27]  B. Menge,et al.  Dection of Direct Versus Indirect Effects: Were Experiments Long Enough? , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Wootton,et al.  Using experimental indices to quantify the strength of species interactions , 2010 .

[29]  P. Yodzis.  The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[30]  Ian T. Carroll,et al.  Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? , 2008, Ecology.

[31]  M. Emmerson,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE , 2005 .

[32]  Marie-Joëlle Rochet,et al.  Qualitative modelling and indicators of exploited ecosystems , 2009 .

[33]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Local trophodynamics and the interaction of marine mammals and fisheries in the Benguela ecosystem , 1998 .

[34]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[35]  Peter Yodzis.  Food Webs and Perturbation Experiments: Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[36]  G. Polis,et al.  Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[37]  Jason S. Link,et al.  Does food web theory work for marine ecosystems , 2002 .

[38]  M. Huxham,et al.  Do Parasites Reduce the Chances of Triangulation in a Real Food Web , 1996 .

[39]  K. Havens,et al.  Scale and Structure in Natural Food Webs , 1992, Science.

[40]  Robert B. Waide,et al.  The food web of a tropical rain forest , 1997 .

[41]  E. Fulton,et al.  Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models , 2003 .

[42]  Robert Planqué,et al.  Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control? , 2009, Ecology letters.

[43]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[44]  Masashi Murakami,et al.  Timescale Hierarchy Determines the Indirect Effects of Fluctuating Subsidy Inputs on In Situ Resources , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Network structure, predator–prey modules, and stability in large food webs , 2008, Theoretical Ecology.

[46]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Disentangling the Web of Life , 2009, Science.

[47]  U. Jacob,et al.  Interaction strength, food web topology and the relative importance of species in food webs. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[48]  P. Yodzis,et al.  The stability of real ecosystems , 1981, Nature.

[49]  Clare J. Veltman,et al.  Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: what can qualitative models offer? , 2005 .

[50]  L. Amaral,et al.  A robust measure of food web intervality , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. , 2009, Ecology.

[52]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of a freshwater food web , 1989 .

[53]  Mark Novak,et al.  Estimating nonlinear interaction strengths: an observation-based method for species-rich food webs. , 2008, Ecology.

[54]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[55]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Food web models: a plea for groups. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[56]  D. Haydon.  Pivotal Assumptions Determining the Relationship between Stability and Complexity: An Analytical Synthesis of the Stability-Complexity Debate , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Lewi Stone,et al.  Advantageous indirect interactions in systems of competition. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Construction and Analysis of a Large Caribbean Food Web , 1993 .

[59]  James Justus,et al.  Loop analysis and qualitative modeling: limitations and merits , 2007 .

[60]  Geoffrey R Hosack,et al.  Assessing model structure uncertainty through an analysis of system feedback and Bayesian networks. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  Andrew D. Huberman,et al.  Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation , 2000, Nature.

[62]  A. Dunham,et al.  Biodiversity maintenance in food webs with regulatory environmental feedbacks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  McIntosh,et al.  Disturbance, resource supply, and food-web architecture in streams , 1998 .

[64]  G. Polis,et al.  Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[65]  H. Luh,et al.  Qualitative Stability and Ambiguity in Model Ecosystems , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[66]  H Nakajima,et al.  Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. I. The chain rule approach. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.

[67]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics , 1997 .

[68]  Samuel J. Mason,et al.  Feedback Theory-Some Properties of Signal Flow Graphs , 1953, Proceedings of the IRE.

[69]  D. Mason,et al.  Compartments revealed in food-web structure , 2003, Nature.

[70]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web , 2000 .

[71]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[72]  Peter Yodzis.  The Dynamics of Highly Aggregated Models of Whole Communities , 1988 .

[73]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  A polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the permanent of a matrix with nonnegative entries , 2004, JACM.

[74]  J. Wootton,et al.  The Nature and Consequences of Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1994 .