Effects of required and optional exchange tasks in online language learning environments

This study investigates the effects of an optional and required (jigsaw) task on learners' quantity and quality of use of language under synchronous and asynchronous conditions. The question raised is: Does performing either of these task types under synchronous conditions cause a compounding effect that either positively or negatively impacts language production? Eighty-six beginning learners of German participated in this study. The results show that the optional task yielded significantly more learner output, both in terms of target language and c-unit counts. The impact of the condition appears to be mixed, favoring the synchronous mode. Regarding quality, students produced fewer errors when performing the required than the optional task. The results of this study have implications for task design and implementation in online learning environments.

[1]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[2]  B. Vanpatten,et al.  Talking to learn : conversation in second language acquisition , 1987 .

[3]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[4]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[5]  Pauline Foster.  A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning. , 1998 .

[6]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Task-based Language Learning and Teaching , 2003 .

[7]  Jenifer Larson-Hall,et al.  A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS , 2009 .

[8]  Guofang Li,et al.  Technology and Task-Based Language Teaching: A Critical Review. , 2011 .

[9]  Patricia A. Duff.  Another Look at Interlanguage Talk: Taking Task to Task , 1985 .

[10]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams,et al.  Effect of task-type and group size on foreign language learner output in synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2006 .

[11]  John R. Anderson.  Learning and memory: An integrated approach, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[12]  Maki Hirotani.  Synchronous Versus Asynchronous CMC and Transfer to Japanese Oral Performance , 2013 .

[13]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  DISTANCE EDUCATION , 2003 .

[14]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[15]  Regina Hampel,et al.  Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment , 2006, ReCALL.

[16]  D. Baca,et al.  A cognitive approach to language learning , 2006 .

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[18]  Senta Goertler,et al.  Opening doors through distance language education : principles, perspectives, and practices , 2008 .

[19]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Computer-mediated discourse in instructed environments , 2008 .

[20]  Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams,et al.  Computer-mediated communication: writing to speak without foreign language anxiety? , 2002 .

[21]  Craig Chaudron,et al.  Second Language Classrooms. Research on Teaching and Learning. , 1988 .

[22]  Kevin Jepson,et al.  Conversations--and Negotiated Interaction--in Text and Voice Chat Rooms. , 2005 .

[23]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion in the Foreign Language Classroom: Conversation in Slow Motion , 1992 .

[24]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Language teaching and networking , 1997 .

[25]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Multilingual Matters 93. , 1993 .

[26]  Margaret Healy Beauvois,et al.  E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion , 1994, Comput. Humanit..

[27]  Catherine Doughty,et al.  Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. , 1998 .

[28]  Guy Cook,et al.  Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson , 1995 .

[29]  J. Klapper.  Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching , 2003 .

[30]  Michael H. Long,et al.  OPTIMAL PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR DISTANCE FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2003 .

[31]  Sally Sieloff Magnan.  Mediating discourse online , 2008 .

[32]  Freda Mishan,et al.  An application of XML to the creation of an interactive resource for authentic language learning tasks , 2003 .

[33]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication , 2000 .

[34]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  The Negotiation Model in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication (CMC): Negotiation in Task-based Email Exchanges , 2013 .

[35]  Michael H. Long.  Task, Group, and Task-Group Interactions. , 1990 .

[36]  Lina Lee,et al.  Online interaction: negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish , 2001, ReCALL.

[37]  Keith Cameron,et al.  Computer assisted language learning (CALL) : media, design, and applications , 1999 .

[38]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Conversations in Slow Motion: Computer-Mediated Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom. , 1998 .

[39]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams,et al.  The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous CMC on Oral Performance in German , 2003 .

[40]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[41]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .