Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT Numbers of diagnostic tests ordered by primary care physicians are growing and many of these tests seem to be unnecessary according to established, evidence-based guidelines. An innovative strategy that focused on clinical problems and associated tests was developed. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of a multifaceted strategy aimed at improving the performance of primary care physicians' test ordering. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a balanced, incomplete block design and randomization at group level. Thirteen groups of primary care physicians underwent the strategy for 3 clinical problems (arm A; cardiovascular topics, upper and lower abdominal complaints), while 13 other groups underwent the strategy for 3 other clinical problems (arm B; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, general complaints, degenerative joint complaints). Each arm acted as a control for the other. SETTING Primary care physician groups in 5 regions in the Netherlands with diagnostic centers recruited from May to September 1998. STUDY PARTICIPANTS Twenty-six primary care physician groups, including 174 primary care physicians. INTERVENTION During the 6 months of intervention, physicians discussed 3 consecutive, personal feedback reports in 3 small group meetings, related them to 3 evidence-based clinical guidelines, and made plans for change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE According to existing national, evidence-based guidelines, a decrease in the total numbers of tests ordered per clinical problem, and of some defined inappropriate tests, is considered a quality improvement. RESULTS For clinical problems allocated to arm A, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 12% among physicians in the arm A intervention, but was unchanged in the arm B control, with a mean reduction of 67 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm A than in arm B (P =.01). For clinical problems allocated to arm B, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 8% among physicians in the arm B intervention, and by 3% in the arm A control, with a mean reduction of 28 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm B than in arm A (P =.22). Physicians in arm A had a significant reduction in mean total number of inappropriate tests ordered for problems allocated to arm A, whereas the reduction in inappropriate test ordered physicians in arm B for problems allocated to arm B was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION In this study, a practice-based, multifaceted strategy using guidelines, feedback, and social interaction resulted in modest improvements in test ordering by primary care physicians.

[1]  P. Pop,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of routine individual feedback to improve rationality and reduce numbers of test requests , 1995, The Lancet.

[2]  Factors predicting differences among general practitioners in test ordering behaviour and in the response to feedback on test requests. , 1996, Family practice.

[3]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations , 1993, The Lancet.

[4]  A D Oxman,et al.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Grol,et al.  Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. , 1994, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[7]  I G McDonald,et al.  Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result , 1996, BMJ.

[8]  R. Grol,et al.  Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  R. Pickering,et al.  Why do GPs perform investigations?: The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays. , 1998, Family practice.

[10]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[11]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Medicine. Communicating statistical information. , 2000, Science.

[12]  J De Maeseneer,et al.  Use of blood tests in general practice: a collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  X Tonesk,et al.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[14]  J. Zaat,et al.  General Practitioners’ Uncertainty, Risk Preference, and Use of Laboratory Tests , 1992, Medical care.

[15]  R. Grol Peer review in primary care. , 1990, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[16]  M Cohen,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines. New-to-practice family physicians' attitudes. , 1996, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[17]  Improving laboratory testing: can we get physicians to focus on outcome? , 1995, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Does a reduction in general practitioners' use of diagnostic tests lead to more hospital referrals? , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  M H Liang,et al.  Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. , 1998, JAMA.

[20]  D. Berwick,et al.  Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited. , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  P. Hjortdahl,et al.  The general practitioner and laboratory utilization: why does it vary? , 1992, Family practice.