Remaining Useful Life Prediction using Deep Learning Approaches: A Review

Abstract Data-driven techniques, especially on artificial intelligence (AI) such as deep learning (DL) techniques, have attracted more and more attention in the manufacturing sector because of the growth of industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data. Tremendous researches of DL techniques have been applied in machine health monitoring, but still very limited works focus on the application of DL on the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction. Precise RUL prediction can significantly improve the reliability and operational safety of the industrial components or systems, avoid fatal breakdown and reduce the maintenance costs. This paper gives a brief introduction of RUL prediction and reviews the start-of-the-art DL approaches in terms of four main representative deep architectures, including Auto-encoder, Deep Belief Network (DBN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). It has been observed that DL techniques attract growing interests on RUL prediction that suggests a promising future of their applications in manufacturing.

[1]  Wenjing Jin,et al.  Enhanced Restricted Boltzmann Machine With Prognosability Regularization for Prognostics and Health Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[3]  Manuel Esperon-Miguez,et al.  A review of physics-based models in prognostics: Application to gears and bearings of rotating machinery , 2016 .

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning to Represent Spatial Transformations with Factored Higher-Order Boltzmann Machines , 2010, Neural Computation.

[5]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Soumaya Yacout,et al.  Bidirectional handshaking LSTM for remaining useful life prediction , 2019, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Yaguo Lei,et al.  Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction , 2018 .

[8]  Peng Wang,et al.  Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[9]  David J Hoffman,et al.  Plasma Biochemistry Values in Emperor Geese (Chen canagica) in Alaska: Comparisons Among Age, Sex, Incubation, and Molt , 2009, Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians.

[10]  Chuang Sun,et al.  Discriminative Deep Belief Networks with Ant Colony Optimization for Health Status Assessment of Machine , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Brian A. Weiss,et al.  A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing , 2019, J. Intell. Manuf..

[12]  Xiang Li,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Nan Chen,et al.  Prognostics and Health Management: A Review on Data Driven Approaches , 2015 .

[14]  Jay Lee,et al.  Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications , 2014 .

[15]  Joseph Mathew,et al.  Rotating machinery prognostics. State of the art, challenges and opportunities , 2009 .

[16]  Jian Ma,et al.  Predicting the Remaining Useful Life of an Aircraft Engine Using a Stacked Sparse Autoencoder with Multilayer Self-Learning , 2018, Complex..

[17]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  Multiobjective Deep Belief Networks Ensemble for Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognostics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[19]  David He,et al.  Using Deep Learning-Based Approach to Predict Remaining Useful Life of Rotating Components , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[20]  Liang Guo,et al.  A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[21]  Lei Ren,et al.  Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[22]  Stoyan Stoyanov,et al.  Prognostic and health management for engineering systems: a review of the data-driven approach and algorithms , 2015 .

[23]  Ruqiang Yan,et al.  Learning to Monitor Machine Health with Convolutional Bi-Directional LSTM Networks , 2017, Sensors.

[24]  Lin Ma,et al.  Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry , 2011 .

[25]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Model-based and data-driven prognostics under different available information , 2013 .

[26]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Prognosis of Defect Propagation Based on Recurrent Neural Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[27]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Overview of Remaining Useful Life Prediction Techniques in Through-life Engineering Services☆ , 2014 .

[29]  Jan Lundberg,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation: review , 2014, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[30]  Dawn An,et al.  Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Li Lin,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks , 2018, Neurocomputing.