Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study

Abstract. Simulated multi-model "diversity" in aerosol direct radiative forcing estimates is often perceived as a measure of aerosol uncertainty. However, current models used for aerosol radiative forcing calculations vary considerably in model components relevant for forcing calculations and the associated "host-model uncertainties" are generally convoluted with the actual aerosol uncertainty. In this AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study we systematically isolate and quantify host model uncertainties on aerosol forcing experiments through prescription of identical aerosol radiative properties in twelve participating models. Even with prescribed aerosol radiative properties, simulated clear-sky and all-sky aerosol radiative forcings show significant diversity. For a purely scattering case with globally constant optical depth of 0.2, the global-mean all-sky top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing is −4.47 Wm−2 and the inter-model standard deviation is 0.55 Wm−2, corresponding to a relative standard deviation of 12%. For a case with partially absorbing aerosol with an aerosol optical depth of 0.2 and single scattering albedo of 0.8, the forcing changes to 1.04 Wm−2, and the standard deviation increases to 1.01 W−2, corresponding to a significant relative standard deviation of 97%. However, the top-of-atmosphere forcing variability owing to absorption (subtracting the scattering case from the case with scattering and absorption) is low, with absolute (relative) standard deviations of 0.45 Wm−2 (8%) clear-sky and 0.62 Wm−2 (11%) all-sky. Scaling the forcing standard deviation for a purely scattering case to match the sulfate radiative forcing in the AeroCom Direct Effect experiment demonstrates that host model uncertainties could explain about 36% of the overall sulfate forcing diversity of 0.11 Wm−2 in the AeroCom Direct Radiative Effect experiment. Host model errors in aerosol radiative forcing are largest in regions of uncertain host model components, such as stratocumulus cloud decks or areas with poorly constrained surface albedos, such as sea ice. Our results demonstrate that host model uncertainties are an important component of aerosol forcing uncertainty that require further attention.

[1]  Kai Zhang,et al.  MAC‐v1: A new global aerosol climatology for climate studies , 2013 .

[2]  S. Bony,et al.  LMDZ5B: the atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[3]  B. Mayer,et al.  Intercomparison of shortwave radiative transfer schemes in global aerosol modeling: results from the AeroCom Radiative Transfer Experiment , 2012 .

[4]  T. Diehl,et al.  Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty , 2012 .

[5]  U. Lohmann,et al.  The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations , 2012 .

[6]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[7]  F. Yu,et al.  Aerosol direct radiative forcing based on GEOS-Chem-APM and uncertainties , 2012 .

[8]  Jerry Y. Pan,et al.  Intercomparison of MODIS albedo retrievals and in situ measurements across the global FLUXNET network , 2012 .

[9]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct, Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing , 2012 .

[10]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[11]  Timothy Shippert,et al.  The Continual Intercomparison of Radiation Codes: Results from Phase I , 2012 .

[12]  C. Jones,et al.  Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model - HadGEM2 , 2011 .

[13]  O. Boucher,et al.  Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2‐ES and the role of ammonium nitrate , 2011 .

[14]  R. Rizzi,et al.  Total cloud cover from satellite observations and climate models , 2010 .

[15]  R. Marchand,et al.  A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS , 2010 .

[16]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[17]  F. Yu,et al.  Simulation of particle size distribution with a global aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number concentrations , 2009 .

[18]  Gunnar Myhre,et al.  Consistency Between Satellite-Derived and Modeled Estimates of the Direct Aerosol Effect , 2009, Science.

[19]  Robert Wood,et al.  Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover , 2009 .

[20]  D. Fahey,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Modelled Radiative Forcing of the Direct Aerosol Effect with Multi-observation Evaluation , 2022 .

[21]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  A k-distribution-based radiation code and its computational optimization for an atmospheric general circulation model , 2008 .

[22]  K. Taylor,et al.  Evaluating the present‐day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models , 2008 .

[23]  J. Penner,et al.  Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation , 2008 .

[24]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[25]  P. Forster,et al.  Impact of an improved shortwave radiation scheme in the MAECHAM5 General Circulation Model , 2007 .

[26]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Aerosol absorption and radiative forcing , 2006 .

[27]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[28]  S. Bony,et al.  The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection , 2006 .

[29]  W. Collins,et al.  The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) , 2006 .

[30]  O. Boucher,et al.  Global estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements , 2005, Nature.

[31]  J. Penner,et al.  Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: Model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and nonsulfate aerosols , 2005 .

[32]  M. Chin,et al.  A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing , 2005 .

[33]  David Crisp,et al.  Intercomparison of shortwave radiative transfer codes and measurements , 2005 .

[34]  S. Emori,et al.  Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport‐radiation model , 2005 .

[35]  O. Boucher,et al.  The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2004 .

[36]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .

[37]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  Intercomparison of models representing direct shortwave radiative forcing by sulfate aerosols , 1998 .

[38]  Chang-Hoi Ho,et al.  Parameterizations for Cloud Overlapping and Shortwave Single-Scattering Properties for Use in General Circulation and Cloud Ensemble Models , 1998 .

[39]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Effect of clouds on direct aerosol radiative forcing of climate , 1997 .

[40]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[41]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[42]  J. Haywood,et al.  The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget , 1995 .

[43]  J. Morcrette.  Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system , 1991 .

[44]  B. Albrecht.  Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[45]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[46]  W. Weaver,et al.  Two-Stream Approximations to Radiative Transfer in Planetary Atmospheres: A Unified Description of Existing Methods and a New Improvement , 1980 .

[47]  S. Twomey.  Pollution and the Planetary Albedo , 1974 .

[48]  J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Climate Modification by Atmospheric Aerosols , 1967, Science.

[49]  A. Ångström.  Atmospheric turbidity, global illumination and planetary albedo of the earth , 1962 .

[50]  G. Mann,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom global models of a range of complexity , 2013 .

[51]  Yang Wei-we,et al.  A Review on , 2008 .

[52]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[53]  Kristen Averyt,et al.  Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[54]  J. Feichter,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Global Indirect Aerosol Effects: a Review , 2005 .

[55]  J. Cozic,et al.  European Geosciences Union Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions , 2004 .