The use of optical flow for the analysis of non-rigid motions

This paper analysis the 2D motion field on the image plane produced by the 3D motion of a plane undergoing simple deformations. When the deformation can be represented by a planar linear vector field, the projected vector field, i.e., the 2D motion field of the deformation, is at most quadratic. This 2D motion field has one singular point, with eigenvalues identical to those of the singular point describing the deformation. As a consequence, the nature of the singular point of the deformation is a projective invariant. When the plane moves and experiences a linear deformation at the same time, the associated 2D motion field is at most quadratic with at most 3 singular points. In the case of a normal rototranslation, i.e., when the angular velocity is normal to the plane, and of a linear deformation, the 2D motion field has one singular point and substantial information on the rigid motion and on the deformation can be recovered from it. Experiments with image sequences of planes moving and undergoing linear deformations show that the proposed analysis can provide accurate results. In addition, experiments with deformable objects, such as water, oil, textiles and rubber show that the proposed approach can provide information on more general 3D deformations.

[1]  Stefan Carlsson,et al.  A "theory" of optical flow , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[2]  H C Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The visual ambiguity of a moving plane , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Verri,et al.  Limit cycles of the two-dimensional motion field , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  H. Helmholtz Über Integrale der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welche den Wirbelbewegungen entsprechen. , 1858 .

[5]  A. Verri,et al.  Mathematical properties of the two-dimensional motion field: from singular points to motion parameters , 1989 .

[6]  E. Hildreth The computation of the velocity field , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  Allen M. Waxman,et al.  The Analytic Structure of Image Flows: Deformation and Segmentation , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  The Derivation Of Qualitative Information In Motion Analysis , 1990, ECCV.

[9]  A. Galione,et al.  Redundant mechanisms of calcium-induced calcium release underlying calcium waves during fertilization of sea urchin eggs. , 1993, Science.

[10]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Non-Rigid Motion and Regge Calculus. , 1989 .

[11]  A. Lichtenberg,et al.  Regular and Chaotic Dynamics , 1992 .

[12]  Sundar C. Amartu,et al.  A new approach to study cardiac motion: The optical flow of cine MR images , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Alessandro Verri,et al.  Motion analysis from first-order properties of optical flow , 1992, CVGIP Image Underst..

[14]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  Derivation of qualitative information in motion analysis , 1990, Image Vis. Comput..

[15]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Performance of optical flow techniques , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Muralidhara Subbarao Interpretation of Image Flow: A Spatio-Temporal Approach , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Bruce A. Thomas,et al.  Image Models for 2-D Flow Visualization and Compression , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[18]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Direct Estimation of Range Flow on Deformable Shape From a Video Rate Range Camera , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  A. Sommerfeld Mechanics of Deformable Bodies , 1950 .

[21]  Michael A. Penna,et al.  Non-rigid motion analysis: Isometric motion , 1992, CVGIP Image Underst..

[22]  Vincent Torre,et al.  The Accuracy of the Computation of Optical Flow and of the Recovery of Motion Parameters , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Hans-Hellmut Nagel,et al.  Displacement vectors derived from second-order intensity variations in image sequences , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[24]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[25]  S Ullman,et al.  Maximizing Rigidity: The Incremental Recovery of 3-D Structure from Rigid and Nonrigid Motion , 1984, Perception.

[26]  Chiao-fe Shu,et al.  Direct estimation and error analysis for oriented patterns , 1993 .

[27]  Amartur Sc,et al.  A new approach to study cardiac motion: the optical flow of cine MR images. , 1993 .

[28]  R. Hetherington The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[29]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[30]  Hans-Hellmut Nagel,et al.  Optical Flow Estimation: Advances and Comparisons , 1994, ECCV.

[31]  D. Shulman,et al.  (Non-)rigid motion interpretation : a regularized approach , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Motion Field and Optical Flow: Qualitative Properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra , 1974 .

[34]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Computerized Flow Field Analysis: Oriented Texture Fields , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..