Capital budgeting methods among Sweden's largest groups of companies. The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies

Abstract This study presents a general description of the state of the art of capital budgeting methods used by Swedish corporations. It is based on a questionnaire sent to 528 companies selected from 500 of the largest Swedish corporations and some from the O-list of companies. The response rate is 24.4%. The study shows that the public sector companies are most frequent users of discounted cash flow (DCF) methods. The payback method is the most used in all industries; also matters size of company. The use of the net present value method has increased over the years, although the use of DCF methods is generally unchanged. Value-based management models have been introduced in the listed companies. Another conclusion is that tradition is an important factor explaining the choice of capital budgeting method. Large companies within the manufacturing industry use DCF methods more often than other companies. In general, the companies seem unconcerned with the tax consequences of capital budgeting decisions. It would appear as if the public companies have not adopted capital budgeting practices supporting shareholder value increases.

[1]  D. Oldroyd,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS IN THE TYNESIDE COAL INDUSTRY c.1700–1820 , 2001 .

[2]  Alan K. Reichert,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES CURRENTLY EMPLOYED BY LARGE U.S. CORPORATIONS , 1983 .

[3]  R. Aggarwal CORPORATE USE OF SOPHISTICATED CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES: A STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE AND A CRITIQUE OF SURVEY RESULTS , 1980 .

[4]  S. Dulman The Development of Discounted Cash Flow Techniques in U. S. Industry , 1989, Business History Review.

[5]  Mikael Collan,et al.  Giga-Investments: Modelling the Valuation of Very Large Industrial Real Investments , 2004 .

[6]  Esbjörn Segelod A comparison of managers' perceptions of short-termism in Sweden and the U.S , 2000 .

[7]  R. Pike A LONGITUDINAL SURVEY ON CAPITAL BUDGETING PRACTICES , 1996 .

[8]  Alan Sangster,et al.  CAPITAL INVESTMENT APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES: A SURVEY OF CURRENT USAGE , 1993 .

[9]  R. Pike An Empirical Study of the Adoption of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Practices and Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1988 .

[10]  John R. Graham,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[11]  G. Arnold,et al.  The Theory‐Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[12]  F. Lefley,et al.  Manufacturing investments in the Czech Republic:: An international comparison , 2004 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Capital-Budgeting Systems and Capabilities Investments in U.S. Companies after the Second World War , 1994, Business History Review.

[14]  Otto Olum Capital investment appraisal techniques , 1976 .

[15]  N. Hellman Investor behaviour : an empirical study of how large Swedish institutional investors make equity investment decisions , 2000 .

[16]  R. Wallace,et al.  Nonresponse bias in mail accounting surveys: A pedagogical note , 1988 .

[17]  EsbjoK rn Segelod Investments and investment processes in professional service groups , 2000 .