Sub-pixel target detection using local spatial information in hyperspectral images

We present two methods to improve the well-known algorithms for hyperspectral point target detection: the constrained energy minimization algorithm (CEM), the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test algorithm (GLRT) and the adaptive coherence estimator algorithm (ACE). The original algorithms rely solely on spectral information and do not use spatial information; this is normally justified in subpixel target detection since the target size is smaller than the size of a pixel. However, we have found that, since the background (and the false alarms) may be spatially correlated and the point spread function can distribute the energy of a point target between several neighboring pixels, we should consider spatial filtering algorithms. The first improvement uses the local spatial mean and covariance matrix which take into account the spatial local mean instead of the global mean. The second considers the fact that the target physical sub-pixel size will appear in a cluster of pixels. We test our algorithms by using the dataset and scoring methodology of the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Target Detection Blind Test project. Results show that both spatial methods independently improve the basic spectral algorithms mentioned above; when used together, the results are even better.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Bowles,et al.  Results of GLMM-based target detection on the RIT data set , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Marin S. Halper Global, local, and stochastic background modeling for target detection in mixed pixels , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Development of a Web-Based Application to Evaluate Target Finding Algorithms , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Jeff Settle,et al.  On constrained energy minimization and the partial unmixing of multispectral images , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2005 .

[7]  Jonathan Martin Mooney,et al.  Automated clustering/segmentation of hyperspectral images based on histogram thresholding , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[8]  William F. Basener Clutter and anomaly removal for enhanced target detection , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Dimitris Manolakis,et al.  Hyperspectral signal models and implications to material detection algorithms , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Qian Du,et al.  Hyperspectral target detection assessment using an online evaluation system , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm? , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  S.R. Rotman,et al.  Improved covariance matrices for point target detection in hyperspectral data , 2008, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronics Systems.

[14]  Vincent Roy Hybrid algorithm for hyperspectral target detection , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  D. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications: a signal processing perspective , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[16]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral subpixel target detection using the linear mixing model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Misregistration impacts on hyperspectral target detection , 2009 .

[18]  W. Farrand Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique , 1997 .