A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.

BACKGROUND The hemodynamic characteristics of different heart valve prostheses have been investigated in vitro with a novel pulse duplicator. A novel valved stent for transapical or percutaneous valve implantation has been compared with a native heart valve and mechanical heart valves. METHODS All experiments were designed to imitate both physiologic pressure ratios and flow characteristics in diastole and systole. After calibrating the system using a human aortic valve (primary orifice diameter: 22.0 mm), the following valves were studied under aortic pulsatile flow conditions: Hall-Kaster (Medtronic-Hall, 20.0 mm), St. Jude Medical (20.0 mm), a newly developed tricuspid valved stent (Tricumed TM4, 20.7 mm) and a newly developed biomechanical valve (Engage aortic valve Model 6000, 21.0 mm). All valves including the human aortic valve were assessed by videotape observation under pulsatile flow conditions. Measured flow-related parameters include in vitro mean transvalvular pressure, regurgitant volume, effective orifice area and performance index. RESULTS The optical assessment of all five valves demonstrated a complete opening during systole and closing at the beginning of diastole. All valves were optically sufficient during diastole. Engage aortic valve Model 6000 showed the highest maximum transvalvular pressure (27.5 +/- 8.2 mmHg), whereas both Hall-Kaster (17.9 +/- 1.5 mmHg) and St. Jude Medical (16.7 +/- 0.7 mmHg) had a lower gradient than the native aortic valve (24.0 +/- 0.2 mmHg) and Tricumed TM4 (21.8 +/- 3.8 mmHg). The maximum effective orifice area of St. Jude Medical amounted to 258.7 +/- 3.4 mm(2), followed by Tricumed TM4 with an area of 222.1 +/- 1.9 mm(2) and the human aortic valve with 160.4 +/- 2.9 mm(2). Hall-Kaster and Engage aortic valve Model 6000 had an area of 198.9 +/- 1.6 mm(2) and 176.7 +/- 3.1 mm(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The pulse duplicator proved to be highly accurate and yielded reproducible results. Since it has been calibrated with a human aortic valve, the hemodynamics of any heart valve prosthesis can be compared with the human valve. This system can evaluate and promote the development of new biological and mechanical heart valve prostheses.

[1]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Pressure drops across prosthetic aortic heart valves under steady and pulsatile flow--in vitro measurements. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M Jones,et al.  In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  J. Heikkilä,et al.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. F. Carey,et al.  The effects of a glycerin-based blood analog on the testing of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  H. Reul,et al.  Two-dimensional color-mapping of turbulent shear stress distribution downstream of two aortic bioprosthetic valves in vitro. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  B Glasmacher,et al.  Primary tissue failure of bioprostheses: new evidence from in vitro tests. , 2001, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[8]  L. E. Curtis,et al.  Heart surgery--legend and a long look. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  S. Werner,et al.  Testung hydrodynamischer Eigenschaften von Herzklappenprothesen mit einem neuen Prüfstand - Testing of the Hydrodynamic Properties of Artificial Heart Valves with a New Test Apparatus , 1994 .