A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design

Abstract Engineering of complex systems often involves teamwork. The members of an engineering team must work together to identify design requirements, explore design spaces, generate design alternatives, and make both interactive and joint design decisions. Because of the latency of information and the disciplinary differences, it is often a difficult process for the members of a team to reach agreements when needed. Negotiation has been studied as a method for facilitating information exchange, mutual understanding, and joint decision making. An argumentation-based negotiation approach was previously proposed by the authors to support collaborative engineering design. In this paper, we present an experiment study that was conducted to evaluate the impact of this negotiation support approach on the process and the outcome of collaborative design. The results of the experiment show both positive effects and limitations of the approach.

[1]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[2]  P. Gulliver.  Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1979 .

[3]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[4]  Mark Klein,et al.  The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights from Complex Systems and Negotiation Research , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[5]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Multiagent Compromise via Negotiation , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[7]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Intergroup Negotiations , 1996 .

[8]  M. Davidson.  Managing Conflict in Organizations , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  A. H. Bond,et al.  An Analysis of Problems and Research in DAI , 1988 .

[10]  W. Evan,et al.  Interorganizational conflict: a labor-management bargaining experiment , 1967 .

[11]  S. C-Y. Lu,et al.  Agent Based Negotiation for Collaborative Design Decision Making , 2004 .

[12]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers , 1994 .

[13]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE NEGOTIATION METHODOLOGY , 1998 .

[14]  Mark Klein,et al.  Towards a Systematic Repository of Knowledge about Managing Collaborative Design Conflicts , 2000, AID.

[15]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  The Use of Groupware for Collaboration in Distributed Student Engineering Design Teams , 2002 .

[16]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design , 1997 .

[17]  Yan Jin,et al.  Argumentation-based negotiation for collaborative engineering design , 2009 .

[18]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[19]  Michael Joseph Scott,et al.  Formalizing Negotiation in Engineering Design , 1999 .

[20]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making , 2003 .

[21]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation , 1998 .

[22]  Mathieu M. Geslin.  An argumentation-based approach to negotiation in collaborative engineering design , 2006 .

[23]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  Imprecision in Engineering Design , 1995 .

[24]  Thomas T. Ballmer,et al.  Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs , 2011 .

[25]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Argumentation-based negotiation , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.