When Does Repeat Burglary Victimisation Occur?

Abstract Research consistently demonstrates that past victimisation is among the best predictors of future risk. Using recorded domestic burglary crime data from Victoria, Australia, analyses were conducted to examine temporal patterns of repeat burglary victimisation. The analyses focus on both time elapsed between incidents at the same location and the time of day that events occur, the latter previously unexamined in the literature. The time-course of revictimisation is as found hitherto: revictimisation occurs swiftly and the risk of repetition decays over time. Considering the time of day, in line with routine activities theory, the majority of incidents (first or follow-up events) occurred during the day. More interestingly, the results suggest that, relative to repeat burglaries that occur months after the first offence, those that occur within 7 days are more likely to occur at the same time of the day as the antecedent event. Moreover, the time course of revictimisation appears to vary for burglaries that occur at different times of the day. The results are discussed in relation to routine activities theory and with respect to their implications for crime reduction.

[1]  Amos H. Hawley,et al.  Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure , 1950 .

[2]  E. H. Simpson,et al.  The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .

[3]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[4]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization , 1977 .

[5]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[6]  James F. Nelson Multiple Victimization in American Cities: A Statistical Analysis of Rare Events , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Richard F. Sparks,et al.  Multiple Victimization: Evidence, Theory, and Future Research , 1981 .

[8]  A. Yashin,et al.  Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. , 1985, The American statistician.

[9]  D. Forrester,et al.  The Kirkholt burglary prevention project, Rochdale , 1988 .

[10]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Ken Pease,et al.  THE TIME COURSE OF REPEAT BURGLARY VICTIMIZATION , 1991 .

[12]  K. Pease,et al.  WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT HIGH CRIME AREAS , 1992 .

[13]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas , 1992 .

[14]  David Wooff,et al.  Statistics: Concepts and Controversies. , 1993 .

[15]  Ken Pease,et al.  Once bitten, twice bitten: repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention , 1993 .

[16]  Ken Pease,et al.  A VICTIM IS A VICTIM IS A VICTIM?Chronic Victimization in Four Sweeps of the British Crime Survey , 1995 .

[17]  Trevor Bennett,et al.  Identifying, explaining, and targeting burglary ‘hot spots’ , 1995 .

[18]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Thinking about Crime Prevention Performance Indicators , 1995 .

[19]  William Spelman,et al.  Once bitten, then what?: Cross-sectional and time-course explanations of repeat victimization , 1995 .

[20]  Ken Pease,et al.  Biting Back: Tackling Repeat Burglary and Car Crime , 1995 .

[21]  Alice Sampson,et al.  Reducing repeat racial victimisation on an East London estate , 1995 .

[22]  G. Farrell,et al.  LIKE TAKING CANDY Why does Repeat Victimization Occur , 1995 .

[23]  Clive Coleman,et al.  Understanding crime data : haunted by the dark figure , 1996 .

[24]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crimes which repeat: undigested evidence from the British Crime Survey 1992 , 1996 .

[25]  K. Bowers,et al.  NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF REPEAT VICTIMIZATION , 1997 .

[26]  G. Farrell,et al.  Repeat victim support , 1997 .

[27]  Ross Homel,et al.  Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication and Injury , 1997 .

[28]  Sandra Walklate,et al.  Is a victim a victim a victim , 1997 .

[29]  K. Pease,et al.  Biting Back II: Reducing Repeat Victimisation in Huddersfield , 1997 .

[30]  Alex Hirschfield,et al.  A Case Study of Non-residential Repeat Burglary on Merseyside , 1998 .

[31]  Crime at Work Vol 2 , 1998 .

[32]  Ken Pease,et al.  'Nuisance' phone calls to women in England and Wales , 1998 .

[33]  Michael J. McCullagh,et al.  IDENTIFYING REPEAT VICTIMIZATION WITH GIS , 1998 .

[34]  M. Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life , 1998 .

[35]  Ken Pease,et al.  Repeat Robbers: Are They Different? , 1998 .

[36]  Carlos Carcach,et al.  Repeat victimisation in Australia : extent, correlates and implications for crime prevention , 1998 .

[37]  Michael J. McCullagh,et al.  Burglary, Victimisation, and Social Deprivation , 1999 .

[38]  K. Kafadar,et al.  Statistics: Concepts and Controversies , 1980 .

[39]  T. Budd,et al.  Burglary of Domestic Dwellings Findings from the British Crime Survey , 1999 .

[40]  Rebecca Moore Understanding Crime Data: Haunted by the Dark Figure , 1999 .

[41]  Gloria Laycock,et al.  Revictimization : Reducing the Heat on Hot Victims , 1996 .

[42]  Eileen Margaret Chiveldave Weir,et al.  Straight from the horse's mouth , 2000 .

[43]  Janet Chaseling,et al.  Repeat Burglary Victimisation: Spatial and Temporal Patterns , 2000 .

[44]  Jerry H. Ratcliffe,et al.  Aoristic analysis: the spatial interpretation of unspecific temporal events , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[45]  Ken Pease,et al.  Repeated bank robbery: themes and variations , 2001 .

[46]  Frank Morgan,et al.  Repeat Burglary in a Perth Suburb: Indicator of Short-Term or Long-Term Risk , 2001 .

[47]  Michael J. McCullagh,et al.  Crime, repeat victimisation and GIS , 2001 .

[48]  Alex Hirschfield,et al.  Mapping and Analysing Crime Data : Lessons from Research and Practice , 2001 .

[49]  James L. Lebeau,et al.  The Impact of a Hurricane on Routine Activities and on Calls for Police Service: Charlotte, North Carolina, and Hurricane Hugo , 2002 .

[50]  Jerry H. Ratcliffe,et al.  Aoristic Signatures and the Spatio-Temporal Analysis of High Volume Crime Patterns , 2002 .

[51]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  The Burglary as Clue to the Future , 2002 .

[52]  Giles Oatley,et al.  Applying the Concept of Revictimization: Using Burglars' Behaviour to Predict Houses at Risk of Future Victimization , 2003 .

[53]  S. Everson Repeat Victimisation and Prolific Offending: Chance or Choice? , 2003 .

[54]  Marcus Felson,et al.  Simple indicators of crime by time of day , 2003 .

[55]  M. Townsley,et al.  Infectious Burglaries. A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis , 2003 .

[56]  Ken Pease,et al.  Prospective hot-spotting - The future of crime mapping? , 2004 .

[57]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation , 2004 .

[58]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  The Stability of Space-Time Clusters of Burglary , 2004 .

[59]  Jerry H. Ratcliffe,et al.  The Hotspot Matrix: A Framework for the Spatio‐Temporal Targeting of Crime Reduction , 2004 .

[60]  Giles Oatley,et al.  Matching Crimes Using Burglars' Modus Operandi: A Test of Three Models , 2005 .

[61]  The Link between Shoplifting and Burglary The Booster Burglar , 2005 .

[62]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Domestic Burglary Repeats and Space-Time Clusters , 2005 .

[63]  Timothy Coupe,et al.  DAYLIGHT AND DARKNESS TARGETING STRATEGIES AND THE RISKS OF BEING SEEN AT RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES , 2006 .

[64]  Youngihn Kho,et al.  GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis , 2006 .

[65]  Jerry H. Ratcliffe,et al.  A Temporal Constraint Theory to Explain Opportunity-Based Spatial Offending Patterns , 2006 .