Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing diffuse and focal white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis

High‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 14 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS) and the trace of the diffusion tensor (〈D〉) and the fractional anisotropy (FA) were determined in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) and in different types of focal MS lesions. A small but significant increase of the 〈D〉 in NAWM compared to control white matter ((840 ± 85) × 10–6 mm2/sec vs. (812 ± 59) × 10–6 mm2/sec; P < 0.01) was found. In addition, there was a significant decrease in the FA of normal‐appearing regions containing well‐defined white matter tracts, such as the genu of the internal capsule. In non‐acute lesions, the 〈D〉 of T1‐hypointense areas was significantly higher than that of T1‐isointense lesions ((1198 ± 248) × 10–6 mm2/sec vs. (1006 ± 142) × 10–6 mm2/sec; P < 0.001), and there was a corresponding inverse relation of FA. Diffusion characteristics of active lesions with different enhancement patterns were also significantly different. DTI with a phase navigated interleaved echo planar imaging technique may be used to detect abnormalities of isotropic and anisotropic diffusion in the NAWM and selected fiber tracts of patients with MS throughout the entire brain, and it demonstrates substantial differences between various types of focal lesions. Magn Reson Med 44:583–591, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Mills,et al.  Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1-45.deg. , 1973 .

[2]  M Filippi,et al.  Magnetization transfer imaging of patients with definite MS and negative conventional MRI , 1999, Neurology.

[3]  S. Reingold,et al.  The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[5]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[6]  R. Moeckel,et al.  Demonstration of Restricted Diffusion Early in the Development of Inflammatory/Demyelinating Lesions - A multiparametric MR Study , 1998 .

[7]  David H. Miller,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[9]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  C. Thomsen,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  G. Barker,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Neurology.

[12]  G. Comi,et al.  Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRI , 2000, Neurology.

[13]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spinal cord. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  C. Thomsen,et al.  Increased water self‐diffusion in chronic plaques and in apparently normal white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis , 1993, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[15]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diffusion imaging of the spinal cord in vivo: Estimation of the principal diffusivities and application to multiple sclerosis , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Assessment of dynamic magnetic resonance images using an independent workstation for determination, visualization, and quantitative analysis of pharmacokinetic and physiological parameters , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[17]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Histopathologic correlate of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo MRI in multiple sclerosis , 1998, Neurology.

[18]  G J Barker,et al.  Comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical subgroups using navigated spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  P Wach,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with navigated interleaved echo-planar imaging and a conventional gradient system. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[21]  T. Ptak,et al.  Investigation of apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion tensor anisotrophy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  J. Pauly,et al.  Isotropic diffusion‐weighted and spiral‐navigated interleaved EPI for routine imaging of acute stroke , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  F Barkhof,et al.  Neuronal damage in T1‐hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions demonstrated in vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[24]  J. Kucharczyk,et al.  Anisotropy in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  P. Basser,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. , 1996, Radiology.

[26]  W. W. Hofmann,et al.  Subthreshold activity at normal and myasthenic end plates , 1963, Neurology.