Accuracy assessment of a canal-tunnel 3d model by comparing photogrammetry and laserscanning recording techniques

Abstract. With recent developments in the field of technology and computer science, conventional methods are being supplanted by laser scanning and digital photogrammetry. These two different surveying techniques generate 3-D models of real world objects or structures. In this paper, we consider the application of terrestrial Laser scanning (TLS) and photogrammetry to the surveying of canal tunnels. The inspection of such structures requires time, safe access, specific processing and professional operators. Therefore, a French partnership proposes to develop a dedicated equipment based on image processing for visual inspection of canal tunnels. A 3D model of the vault and side walls of the tunnel is constructed from images recorded onboard a boat moving inside the tunnel. To assess the accuracy of this photogrammetric model (PM), a reference model is build using static TLS. We here address the problem comparing the resulting point clouds. Difficulties arise because of the highly differentiated acquisition processes, which result in very different point densities. We propose a new tool, designed to compare differences between pairs of point cloud or surfaces (triangulated meshes). Moreover, dealing with huge datasets requires the implementation of appropriate structures and algorithms. Several techniques are presented : point-to-point, cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-mesh. In addition farthest point resampling, octree structure and Hausdorff distance are adopted and described. Experimental results are shown for a 475 m long canal tunnel located in France.

[1]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[2]  Hanan Samet,et al.  An Overview of Quadtrees, Octrees, and Related Hierarchical Data Structures , 1988 .

[3]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[4]  Fulvio Rinaudo,et al.  Multiple scan registration in LIDAR close-range applications , 2003 .

[5]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Numerical Geometry of Non-Rigid Shapes , 2009, Monographs in Computer Science.

[6]  Marko Pejić,et al.  Design and optimisation of laser scanning for tunnels geometry inspection , 2013 .

[7]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[8]  Jen-Yu Han,et al.  Monitoring tunnel profile by means of multi-epoch dispersed 3-D LiDAR point clouds , 2013 .

[9]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  CHANGE DETECTION ON POINTS CLOUD DATA ACQUIRED W ITH A GROUND LASER SCANNER , 2005 .

[10]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Comparing point clouds , 2004, SGP '04.

[11]  Pierre Grussenmeyer,et al.  DEVISING A VISUAL INSPECTION SYSTEM FOR CANAL TUNNELS: PRELIMINARY STUDIES , 2013 .

[12]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  The farthest point strategy for progressive image sampling , 1994, Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2 - Conference B: Computer Vision & Image Processing. (Cat. No.94CH3440-5).

[13]  Francisco Javier Ariza-López,et al.  Influence of sample size on line-based positional assessment methods for road data , 2011 .

[14]  Kwang-Yeom Kim,et al.  Measurement of Tunnel 3-D Displacement using Digital Photogrammetry , 2007 .

[15]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.