Carotid Artery Stenosis: Grayscale and Doppler Ultrasound Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of vascular ultrasonography (US) to come to a consensus regarding Doppler US for assistance in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. The panel's consensus statement is believed to represent a reasonable position on the basis of analysis of available literature and panelists' experience. Key elements of the statement include the following: First, all internal carotid artery (ICA) examinations should be performed with grayscale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler US. Second, the degree of stenosis determined at grayscale and Doppler US should be stratified into the categories of normal (no stenosis), less than 50% stenosis, 50 to 69% stenosis, ≥70% stenosis to near occlusion, near occlusion, and total occlusion. Third, ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the presence of plaque on grayscale and/or color Doppler images are primarily used in the diagnosis and grading of ICA stenosis. Two additional parameters (the ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio and ICA end diastolic velocity) may also be used when clinical or technical factors raise concern that ICA PSV may not be representative of the extent of disease. Fourth, ICA should be diagnosed as normal when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible, less than 50% stenosis when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and plaque or intimal thickening is visible, 50 to 69% stenosis when ICA PSV is 125 to 230 cm/second and plaque is visible, ≥70% stenosis to near occlusion when ICA PSV is more than 230 cm/second and visible plaque and lumen narrowing are seen, near occlusion when there is a markedly narrowed lumen on color Doppler US, and total occlusion when there is no detectable patent lumen on grayscale US and no flow on spectral, power, and color Doppler US. Fifth, the final report should discuss velocity measurements and grayscale and color Doppler findings. Study limitations should be noted when they exist. The conclusion should state an estimated degree of ICA stenosis as reflected in these categories. The panel also considered various technical aspects of carotid US and methods for quality assessment, and identified several important unanswered questions meriting future research.

[1]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Utility in Routine Clinical Practice , 2002, Stroke.

[2]  S. El-Saden,et al.  Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  A. Umemura,et al.  B-Mode Flow Imaging of the Carotid Artery , 2001, Stroke.

[4]  P. Robless,et al.  Carotid duplex ultrasonography: Importance of standardisation , 2000 .

[5]  E M James,et al.  Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. , 2000, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[6]  T. Magee,et al.  Carotid duplex imaging: variation and validation , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  G M Hathout,et al.  Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction? , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  T. Huber,et al.  Surgical decision making for carotid endarterectomy and contemporary magnetic resonance angiography. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[9]  V. Ladam-Marcus,et al.  Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  S. Salles-Cunha,et al.  Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging: A direct approach to stenosis measurement. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  A. Duerinckx,et al.  Doppler Sonographic Parameters for Detection of Carotid Stenosis: Is There an Optimum Method for Their Selection? , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  H Becker,et al.  Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound: A Hemodynamic Method to Normalize for Interindividual and Interequipment Variability , 1999, Stroke.

[13]  P Robillard,et al.  The value of internal carotid systolic velocity ratio for assessing carotid artery stenosis with Doppler sonography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  S Byrd,et al.  Carotid duplex ultrasonography: importance of standardisation. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborators and Vascular Laboratories. , 1998, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[15]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. AbuRahma,et al.  Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials , 1998, Annals of vascular surgery.

[17]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. , 1998, Journal of insurance medicine.

[18]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Screening in Patients with Lower Extremity Atherosclerosis: A Prospective Study , 1997, Annals of vascular surgery.

[19]  J. Polak,et al.  Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. , 1997, Stroke.

[20]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. , 1997, Stroke.

[21]  W. Powers,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease. , 1996, Stroke.

[22]  M. Fillinger,et al.  Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  W H Baker,et al.  An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance). A multicenter experience. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. , 1996, Stroke.

[24]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. , 1996, Stroke.

[25]  D S Sumner,et al.  Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  M. L. Walker,et al.  Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography. Comparison with digital subtraction angiography in internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[27]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  P. Cooperberg,et al.  Duplex ultrasonography criteria for internal carotid stenosis of more than 70% diameter: angiographic correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. , 1995, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[29]  D E Strandness,et al.  Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  D. Weiss,et al.  Duplex accuracy compared with angiography in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Trial for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[31]  D Saloner,et al.  Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  M. Neale,et al.  Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[33]  M G Hunink,et al.  Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[35]  G. Moneta,et al.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[36]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[38]  B. Carroll Duplex sonography in patients with hemispheric symptoms. , 1989, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[39]  G. Call,et al.  Degree of cervical carotid artery stenosis and hemispheric stroke: duplex US findings. , 1989, Radiology.

[40]  K. W. Marich,et al.  Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. , 1988, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[41]  J. Sackett,et al.  Correlation of high-resolution, B-mode and continuous-wave Doppler sonography with arteriography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. , 1983, Radiology.