Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Study queStion How effective is supported computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as an adjunct to usual primary care for adults with depression? MethodS This was a pragmatic, multicentre, three arm, parallel randomised controlled trial with simple randomisation. Treatment allocation was not blinded. Participants were adults with symptoms of depression (score ≥10 on nine item patient health questionnaire, PHQ-9) who were randomised to receive a commercially produced cCBT programme (“Beating the Blues”) or a free to use cCBT programme (MoodGYM) in addition to usual GP care. Participants were supported and encouraged to complete the programme via weekly telephone calls. Control participants were offered usual GP care, with no constraints on the range of treatments that could be accessed. The primary outcome was severity of depression assessed with the PHQ-9 at four months. Secondary outcomes included health related quality of life (measured by SF-36) and psychological wellbeing (measured by CORE-OM) at four, 12, and 24 months and depression at 12 and 24 months. Study anSwer and liMitationS Participants offered commercial or free to use cCBT experienced no additional improvement in depression compared with usual GP care at four months (odds ratio 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.88) for Beating the Blues v usual GP care; 0.98 (0.62 to 1.56) for MoodGYM v usual GP care). There was no evidence of an overall difference between either programme compared with usual GP care (0.99 (0.57 to 1.70) and 0.68 (0.42 to 1.10), respectively) at any time point. Commercially provided cCBT conferred no additional benefit over free to use cCBT or usual GP care at any follow-up point. Uptake and use of cCBT was low, despite regular telephone support. Nearly a quarter of participants (24%) had dropped out by four months. The study did not have enough power to detect small differences so these cannot be ruled out. Findings cannot be generalised to cCBT offered with a much higher level of guidance and support. what thiS Study addS Supported cCBT does not substantially improve depression outcomes compared with usual GP care alone. In this study, neither a commercially available nor free to use computerised CBT intervention was superior to usual GP care. Funding, CoMpeting intereStS, data Sharing Commissioned and funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (project No 06/43/05). The authors have no competing interests. Requests for patient level data will be considered by the REEACT trial management group trial regiStration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91947481.

[1]  Michelle G. Craske,et al.  Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  M. Barkham,et al.  Service profiling and Outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies : Patient-Focused Research , 2001 .

[3]  J. Geller,et al.  What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research , 1997 .

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[5]  P. Bower,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in primary care. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[6]  Simon Gilbody,et al.  Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[7]  Karina Lovell,et al.  Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care , 2015, BMJ Open.

[8]  E. Mayo-Wilson Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Psychological medicine.

[9]  Christopher Dowrick,et al.  Management of depression in UK general practice in relation to scores on depression severity questionnaires: analysis of medical record data , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  H. Christensen,et al.  Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  G. Andersson,et al.  Self-Guided Psychological Treatment for Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  P Sutcliffe,et al.  Health technology assessment. , 1986, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[13]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions. , 2004, The American journal of psychiatry.

[14]  G. Andersson,et al.  Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Cognitive behaviour therapy.

[15]  G Lewis,et al.  Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers , 1992, Psychological Medicine.

[16]  Richard Layard,et al.  The case for psychological treatment centres , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Michael J. Campbell,et al.  A randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[18]  T. Furukawa,et al.  Is computerised CBT really helpful for adult depression?-A meta-analytic re-evaluation of CCBT for adult depression in terms of clinical implementation and methodological validity , 2013, BMC Psychiatry.

[19]  E. Kaltenthaler,et al.  The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review , 2008, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  D. Clark,et al.  Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: The IAPT experience , 2011, International review of psychiatry.

[21]  I. Levav,et al.  The treatment gap in mental health care. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[22]  Laura Manea,et al.  Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[23]  Per Carlbring,et al.  Guided Internet‐based vs. face‐to‐face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2014, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[24]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure , 2002 .

[25]  A. Howe,et al.  Depression in primary care: three key challenges , 2008, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[26]  Ricardo Araya,et al.  Therapist-delivered internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[27]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000 , 2004, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[28]  S. Gilbody,et al.  Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence , 2008, Psychological Medicine.

[29]  Katherine E Henson,et al.  Risk of Suicide After Cancer Diagnosis in England , 2018, JAMA psychiatry.

[30]  R. Araya,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in primary care: the Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT) trial. , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[31]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[32]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[33]  Gerhard Andersson,et al.  Psychological treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[34]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  R. Spitzer,et al.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. , 1999, JAMA.