Coping and Construal Level Matching Drives Health Message Effectiveness via Response Efficacy or Self-Efficacy Enhancement

Five experiments examine the nature of different coping strategies and their subsequent effects on the effectiveness of health messages. We theorize that the two strategies of problem-focused versus emotion-focused coping are systematically associated with distinct construal levels (lower vs. higher), and thus messages cast at different levels of construal are differentially effective when a particular coping strategy is being activated. Specifically, we demonstrate that consumers primed with problem-focused strategies are more persuaded by messages presented at lower levels of construal, whereas consumers primed with emotion-focused strategies are more persuaded by messages presented at higher levels of construal. In addition, we posit that matching with each different type of coping strategy (problem-focused vs. emotion-focused coping) is driven by distinct types of efficacy processes. In particular, we demonstrate that the effects of a match with problem-focused coping are driven by self-efficacy, and the effects of a match with emotion-focused coping are driven by response efficacy. These findings make a significant contribution by building bridges between three theoretical traditions: coping, construal level, and efficacy in the context of health messaging.

[1]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Looking into the Future: A Match between Self-View and Temporal Distance , 2013 .

[2]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[3]  Janice L. Krieger,et al.  Reconceptualizing Efficacy in Substance Use Prevention Research: Refusal Response Efficacy and Drug Resistance Self-Efficacy in Adolescent Substance Use , 2013, Health communication.

[4]  A. Duhachek,et al.  Guilt versus Shame: Coping, Fluency, and Framing in the Effectiveness of Responsible Drinking Messages , 2012 .

[5]  K. White,et al.  It's the Mind-Set that Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors , 2011 .

[6]  Zakary L. Tormala,et al.  “Think” Versus “Feel” Framing Effects in Persuasion , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Greeson,et al.  Developing Mindfulness in College Students Through Movement-Based Courses: Effects on Self-Regulatory Self-Efficacy, Mood, Stress, and Sleep Quality , 2010, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[9]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[10]  E. Wan,et al.  Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages , 2009 .

[11]  John Fitzgibbon,et al.  The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages , 2009 .

[12]  T. Chan,et al.  Consumers' adoption of new technology products: the role of coping strategies , 2009 .

[13]  Vanessa M. Patrick,et al.  Psychological Distancing: Why Happiness Helps You See the Big Picture , 2009 .

[14]  Katie LaPlant Turkiewicz,et al.  Response and Self-Efficacy of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis of this Important Element of AIDS Education and Prevention , 2009 .

[15]  Csw Acsw Doris J. Weller Msw,et al.  EMOTIONAL REACTIONS OF PATIENT, FAMILY, AND STAFF IN AN ACUTE-CARE PERIOD OF SPINAL CORD INJURY , 2008 .

[16]  A. Duhachek.  Summing Up the State of Coping Research , 2008 .

[17]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Consumer Wait Management Strategies for Negative Service Events: A Coping Approach , 2008 .

[18]  J. Astin,et al.  Negative Affect, Emotional Acceptance, and Smoking Cessation , 2007, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[19]  D. D. de Ridder,et al.  Does confrontation with potential goal failure promote self-regulation? Examining the role of distress in the pursuit of weight goals , 2007 .

[20]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences , 2007 .

[22]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[23]  Traci L Mann,et al.  The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. , 2007, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[24]  N. Nicolson.  Measurement of cortisol. , 2007 .

[25]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Efficacy of Health Messages , 2006 .

[27]  M. Zanna,et al.  Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute Information , 2005 .

[29]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Self‐Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration , 2005 .

[30]  T. Ownsworth.  The Impact of Defensive Denial upon Adjustment Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 2005 .

[31]  B. Compas,et al.  Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis , 1987, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[32]  C. Chambliss,et al.  Efficacy attribution, locus of control, and weight loss , 1979, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[33]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Consumer Personality and Coping: Testing Rival Theories of Process , 2005 .

[34]  Barbara Cole,et al.  Coping with a threatened group identity: Psychosocial and neuroendocrine responses , 2004 .

[35]  G. Menon,et al.  When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk , 2004 .

[36]  S. Dickerson,et al.  Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  I. Peretz,et al.  Effects of Relaxing Music on Salivary Cortisol Level after Psychological Stress , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Time-dependent gambling: odds now, money later. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[41]  R Schwarzer,et al.  Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[42]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Positive affect and the other side of coping. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[43]  Y. Trope,et al.  Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Avoidance or Vigilance? The Psychology of False-Positive Test Results , 1999 .

[45]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[46]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[47]  J Brug,et al.  The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[48]  J. Bettman,et al.  Sources of Consumers Stress and Their Coping Strategies , 1999 .

[49]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  How effective is tailored print communication? , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[50]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[51]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages , 1998 .

[52]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[53]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit , 1997 .

[54]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  G. Loewenstein.  Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[56]  K. Witte.  Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[57]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  The role of attitude objects in attitude functions , 1990 .

[58]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[59]  S. Folkman,et al.  [An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample]. , 1980, Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research.

[60]  S. K. Wurtele,et al.  Relative contributions of protection motivation theory components in predicting exercise intentions and behavior. , 1987, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[61]  J. E. Maddux,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Health Enhancement: Investigation of a Combined Protection Motivation and Self-Efficacy Model , 1986 .

[62]  A. Deaton.  Denial in the aftermath of traumatic head injury: Its manifestations, measurement, and treatment. , 1986 .

[63]  R. Rogers.  Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[64]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[65]  P. Miller,et al.  Emotional reactions of patient, family, and staff in acute-care period of spinal cord injury: part 1. , 1977, Social work in health care.

[66]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[67]  D. S. Holmes,et al.  Effectiveness of situation redefinition and affective isolation in coping with stress. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.