Assist-as-Needed Robot-Aided Gait Training Improves Walking Function in Individuals Following Stroke

A novel robot-aided assist-as-needed gait training paradigm has been developed recently. This paradigm encourages subjects' active participation during training. Previous pilot studies demonstrated that assist-as-needed robot-aided gait training (RAGT) improves treadmill walking performance post-stroke. However, it is not known if there is an over-ground transfer of the training effects from RAGT on treadmill or long-term retention of the effects. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of assist-as-needed RAGT on over-ground walking pattern post-stroke. Nine stroke subjects received RAGT with visual feedback of each subject's instantaneous ankle malleolus position relative to a target template for 15 40-minute sessions. Clinical evaluations and gait analyses were performed before, immediately after, and 6 months post-training. Stroke subjects demonstrated significant improvements and some long-term retention of the improvements in their self-selected over-ground walking speed, Dynamic Gait Index, Timed Up and Go, peak knee flexion angle during swing phase and total hip joint excursion over the whole gait cycle for their affected leg . These preliminary results demonstrate that subjects improved their over-ground walking pattern and some clinical gait measures post-training suggesting that assist-as-needed RAGT including visual feedback may be an effective approach to improve over-ground walking pattern post-stroke.

[1]  Energy expenditure of hemiplegic subjects during walking. , 1963, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  J Perry,et al.  The Mechanics of Walking in Hemiplegia , 1969, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[4]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors. , 1988, Age and ageing.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  M. Maležič,et al.  Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[8]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[9]  W. Berg,et al.  Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[10]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[11]  F. Alton,et al.  A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  F. Zajac,et al.  Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Sandra M. Woolley,et al.  Characteristics of Gait in Hemiplegia , 2001, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[14]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Latash,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Heleen Beckerman,et al.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness , 2001, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Walking is more like catching than tapping: gait in the elderly as a complex cognitive task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  F. Zajac,et al.  Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[20]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  T. Kesar,et al.  Catchlike property of skeletal muscle: Recent findings and clinical implications , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[22]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[23]  J. Burdick,et al.  Implications of Assist-As-Needed Robotic Step Training after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Begg,et al.  Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[25]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[26]  G. Fulk,et al.  Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke , 2008, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[27]  H. Thieme Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008 .

[28]  M. Hütler,et al.  Functional Capacity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[29]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Slacking by the human motor system: Computational models and implications for robotic orthoses , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) , 2009, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[31]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Distributed neural networks for controlling human locomotion Lessons from normal and SCI subjects , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[32]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  Katherine S. Rudolph,et al.  Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[34]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[35]  Robert Riener,et al.  Controlling patient participation during robot-assisted gait training , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  Steven Y Cen,et al.  Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[37]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Design of a minimally constraining, passively supported gait training exoskeleton: ALEX II , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[39]  David J Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Trainer variability during step training after spinal cord injury: Implications for robotic gait-training device design. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[40]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Gregory E Hicks,et al.  Minimal detectable change for gait variables collected during treadmill walking in individuals post-stroke. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[42]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[43]  C. Velozo,et al.  Minimum Detectable Change of the Berg Balance Scale and Dynamic Gait Index in Older Persons at Risk for Falling , 2011, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[44]  Vimonwan Hiengkaew,et al.  Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[45]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Degrees-of-freedom of a robotic exoskeleton and human adaptation to new gait templates , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[46]  William Z Rymer,et al.  Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[47]  Sunil K Agrawal,et al.  Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[48]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[49]  M. Folstein,et al.  Mini‐Mental State Examination , 2014 .