Classification of SAR images using a general and tractable multiplicative model

Among the frameworks for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) image modelling and analysis, the multiplicative model is very accurate and successful. It is based on the assumption that the observed random field is the result of the product of two independent and unobserved random fields: X and Y. The random field X models the terrain backscatter and, thus, depends only on the type of area to which each pixel belongs. The random field Y takes into account that SAR images are the result of a coherent imaging system that produces the well-known phenomenon called speckle noise, and that they are generated by performing an average of n statistically independent images (looks) in order to reduce the noise effect. There are various ways of modelling the random field X; recently the Γ−1/2(α, γ) distribution was proposed. This, with the usual Γ1/2(n, n) distribution for the amplitude speckle, resulted in a new distribution for the return: the (α, γ, n) law. The parameters α and γ depend only on the ground truth, and n is the number of looks. The advantage of this distribution over the ones used in the past is that it models very well extremely heterogeneous areas like cities, as well as moderately heterogeneous areas like forests and homogeneous areas like pastures. As the ground data can be characterized by the parameters α and γ, their estimation in each pixel generates parameter maps that can be used as the input for classification methods. In this work, moment estimators are used on simulated and on real SAR images and, then, a supervised classification technique (Gaussian maximum likelihood) is performed and evaluated. Excellent classification results are obtained.

[1]  Marta Mejail,et al.  Approximation of distributions for SAR Images: proposal, evaluation and practical consequences , 2001 .

[2]  Julian Besag,et al.  Towards Bayesian image analysis , 1993 .

[3]  R. Redner,et al.  Mixture densities, maximum likelihood, and the EM algorithm , 1984 .

[4]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Analog estimation methods in econometrics , 1988 .

[5]  Francisco Cribari-Neto,et al.  Minute feature analysis in speckled imagery , 2002, Proceedings. XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing.

[6]  J. Kong,et al.  K-Distribution and Polarimetric Terrain Radar Clutter , 1990, Progress In Electromagnetics Research.

[7]  Oscar H. Bustos,et al.  M-Estimators of Roughness and Scale for-Modelled SAR Imagery , 2002, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[8]  Julian Besag,et al.  Digital Image Processing: Towards Bayesian image analysis , 1989 .

[9]  C. da Costa Freitas Yanasse,et al.  Alternative distributions for the multiplicative model in SAR images , 1995, 1995 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '95. Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications.

[10]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  A model for extremely heterogeneous clutter , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Improving estimation for intensity SAR data , 1998 .

[12]  R. T. Shin,et al.  K-Distribution and Multi-Frequency Polarmetric Terrain Radar Clutter , 1991 .

[13]  Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Hyperbolic Distributions and Ramifications: Contributions to Theory and Application , 1981 .

[14]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Improved estimation of clutter properties in speckled imagery , 2002 .

[15]  L. Devroye Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation , 1986 .

[16]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Parametric roughness estimation in amplitude SAR images under the multiplicative model , 2000 .

[17]  J. A. Ritcey,et al.  Calculating the K-distribution by saddlepoint integration , 1995 .

[18]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Stochastic distributions and the multiplicative model: Relations, properties, estimators and applications to SAR image analysis , 1995 .

[19]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .

[20]  A.C. Frery,et al.  A user-friendly system for synthetic aperture radar image classification based on grayscale distributional properties and context , 1997, Proceedings X Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing.

[21]  Charles F. Manski Analog Estimation Methods in Econometrics: Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability , 1988 .