Multimedia Learning and Working Memory Capacity

This chapter addresses the role that working memory capacity (WMC) plays in learning in multimedia environments. WMC represents the ability to control attention, that is, to be able to remain focused on the task at hand while simultaneously retrieving relevant information from long-term memory, all in the presence of distraction. The chapter focuses on how individual differences in attentional control affect cognitive performance, in general, and cognitive performance in multimedia environments, in particular. A review of the relevant literature demonstrates that, in general, students with high WMC outperform students with low WMC on measures of cognitive performance. However, there has been very little research addressing the role of WMC in learning in multimedia environments. To address this need, the authors conducted a study that examined the effects of WMC on learning in a multimedia environment. Results of this study indicated students with high WMC recalled and transferred significantly more information than students with low WMC. Ultimately, this chapter provides evidence that individual differences in working memory capacity should be taken into account when creating and implementing multimedia instructional environments.

[1]  Paul Ginns Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[3]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Michael W. Pratt,et al.  Telling tales: Aging, working memory, and the narrative cohesion of story retellings. , 1989 .

[5]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[6]  Richard E Mayer,et al.  The case for coherence in scientific explanations: quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct , 2000 .

[8]  J. Gaultney,et al.  Utilization deficiency and working memory capacity in adult memory performance: not just for children anymore , 2005 .

[9]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[11]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[12]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[14]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking , 1988 .

[15]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Who is Likely to Acquire Programming Skills? , 1991 .

[16]  Stefan Krumm,et al.  Reasoning=working memory¿attention , 2005 .

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[21]  Josef C. Schrock,et al.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences. , 1983 .

[23]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[25]  J. Wiley,et al.  An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[26]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Frederick L. Oswald,et al.  Does Domain Knowledge Moderate Involvement of Working Memory Capacity in Higher-Level Cognition? A Test of Three Models. , 2005 .

[28]  R. Engle,et al.  Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention". , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[30]  R. Morrell,et al.  The effects of age, illustrations, and task variables on the performance of procedural assembly tasks. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[31]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  Learning by imagining. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[33]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[34]  A. Miyake,et al.  Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. , 1990 .

[36]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[37]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[38]  L Hasher,et al.  Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Alison Ollerenshaw,et al.  Is an Illustration Always Worth Ten Thousand Words? Effects of Prior Knowledge, Learning Style and Multimedia Illustrations on Text Comprehension , 1997 .

[42]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[43]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[44]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  M. Daneman,et al.  Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context , 1986 .

[46]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[47]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[48]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[50]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. , 1994 .

[51]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[52]  S. Handley,et al.  Conditional reasoning and the Tower of Hanoi: the role of spatial and verbal working memory. , 2002, British journal of psychology.