Value of visual versus central quantitative measurements of angiographic success after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. NHLBI PTCA Registry Investigators.

[1]  C J Slager,et al.  Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. , 1995, Circulation.

[2]  D. Faxon.  Effect of high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis: Final results of the MARCATOR study, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cilazapril , 1995 .

[3]  P. Hartigan,et al.  Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1994, Circulation.

[4]  H De Geest,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. , 1994, American heart journal.

[5]  J. Isner,et al.  Failure of angiography to accurately depict the extent of coronary artery narrowing in three fatal cases of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Inability of coronary blood flow reserve measurements to assess the efficacy of coronary angioplasty in the first 24 hours in unselected patients. , 1991, American heart journal.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  Edge detection versus videodensitometry for quantitative angiographic assessment of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  J. Reiber,et al.  Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitatively. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  An overview of coronary quantitation techniques as of 1989 , 1991 .

[11]  Peter Niederer,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[12]  R. Vogel,et al.  Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: new standards for clinical studies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.

[16]  R. Kerber,et al.  Assessing the physiologic significance of coronary obstructions in patients: importance of diffuse undetected atherosclerosis. , 1988, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[17]  D. Faxon,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  E J Topol,et al.  Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  W Siegenthaler,et al.  Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The early Zurich experience. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. LeFree,et al.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.

[21]  E. Bates,et al.  Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  E L Bolson,et al.  Quantitative computer techniques for analyzing coronary arteriograms. , 1986, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[23]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[24]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Long-term efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PTCA Registry. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L D Fisher,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[28]  W. Roberts,et al.  Quantification of Coronary Arterial Narrowing at Necropsy in Acute Transmural Myocardial Infarction: Analysis and Comparison of Findings in 27 Patients and 22 Controls , 1980, Circulation.

[29]  W. Siegenthaler,et al.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[31]  T. Takaro,et al.  Observer Agreement in Evaluating Coronary Angiograms , 1975, Circulation.