Low cost (audio) recording (LCR) for advancing soundscape ecology towards the conservation of sonic complexity and biodiversity in natural and urban landscapes

Low cost (audio) recorders (LCRs) represent a new opportunity to investigate the sonic complexity of both natural and urban ecosystems. LCRs are inexpensive sampling audio recorders which have the external shape of a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, and are composed of a microphone, an analog-to-digital converter, central processing unit with permanent internal non-volatile memory, rechargeable battery, and a USB connection. The reduced dimensions allow the device to be deployed inconspicuously within any environment, in any configuration and for an extended time period. This investigation tested a specific type of LCR (UR-09) with a spectral range of 8 kHz - sufficient to cover the acoustic range of most western Palearctic songbirds. The reliability of the UR-09, compared with other commercial recorders (Zoom H4 and Song Meter SM1) and based on the quality of recordings quantified by the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), was tested and confirmed. An example of the application of LCRs is presented in an evaluation of the audio patterns occurring during dawn and dusk choruses within a forested ecosystem. Results of this investigation are encouraging and a new generation of LCR devices is currently being designed with real-time acoustic data processing capabilities, timer programmability, a larger frequency range and wireless communication compatibility. LCRs are revealed to be ideal instruments to conduct surveys in fragile or protected areas and also in urban environments. Moreover, due to their low cost, they can be used to encourage research in soundscape ecology, especially within developing countries, where large areas can be monitored by professionals or incorporating citizen science models of data collection.

[1]  C. Lahariya.  The state of the world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. , 2008, Indian pediatrics.

[2]  Jinha Jung,et al.  Modeling acoustic diversity using soundscape recordings and LIDAR-derived metrics of vertical forest structure in a neotropical rainforest , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes , 2009 .

[5]  Jian Kang,et al.  Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces , 2005 .

[6]  Peter P. Marra,et al.  Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs , 2012 .

[7]  Luigi Piccioli,et al.  Avian soundscapes and cognitive landscapes: theory, application and ecological perspectives , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Assessing biodiversity with sound: Do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? , 2013 .

[9]  Almo Farina,et al.  A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) , 2011 .

[10]  Christopher B Sturdy,et al.  Anthropogenic noise decreases urban songbird diversity and may contribute to homogenization , 2013, Global change biology.

[11]  K. Hobson,et al.  Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system , 2002 .

[12]  Sarah L. Dumyahn,et al.  What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  David A. Luther,et al.  Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Francisco Romero,et al.  Tolerance to noise in 91 bird species from 27 urban gardens of Iberian Peninsula , 2012 .

[15]  M. Uschold,et al.  Methods and applications , 1953 .

[16]  Nadia Pieretti,et al.  Sonic environment and vegetation structure: A methodological approach for a soundscape analysis of a Mediterranean maqui , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[17]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  The temporal structure of urban soundscapes , 2006 .

[18]  D. Theobald,et al.  Anthropogenic noise exposure in protected natural areas: estimating the scale of ecological consequences , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Monica Wachowicz,et al.  Movement-Aware Applications for Sustainable Mobility: Technologies and Approaches , 2010 .

[20]  P. Bell,et al.  Aesthetic, Affective, and Cognitive Effects of Noise on Natural Landscape Assessment , 1999 .

[21]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[22]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[23]  Stefano Mancuso,et al.  Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. , 2012, Trends in plant science.

[24]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Ambio.

[25]  Almo Farina,et al.  Neighbours' talk: interspecific choruses among songbirds , 2013 .

[26]  M. Renton,et al.  Out of Sight but Not out of Mind: Alternative Means of Communication in Plants , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  P. Warren,et al.  Tits, noise and urban bioacoustics. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  Paul Roe,et al.  Archiving nature's heartbeat using smartphones , 2010 .

[29]  Bernard L. Krause.  The Great Animal Orchestra: Finding the Origins of Music in the World's Wild Places , 2012 .

[30]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape , 2011 .

[31]  E. Öhrström,et al.  ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS IN RELATION TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL SOUNDSCAPES , 2002 .

[32]  Alessandro Bogliolo,et al.  Virtual Sense: A Java-Based Open Platform for Ultra-Low-Power Wireless Sensor Nodes , 2012, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[33]  Nathan J. Kleist,et al.  Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Mei Zhang,et al.  Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces , 2010 .

[36]  Nadia Pieretti,et al.  The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterranean Europe case-study , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[37]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation , 2008 .

[38]  Anne E. Goodenough,et al.  Development of a Rapid and Precise Method of Digital Image Analysis to Quantify Canopy Density and Structural Complexity , 2012 .

[39]  William J. Davies,et al.  Special issue: Applied soundscapes , 2013 .

[40]  Eric P. Kasten,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban–rural gradient , 2011 .

[41]  Jérôme Sueur,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[43]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of animal sound within a neotropical forest , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[44]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Global estimation of animal diversity using automatic acoustic sensors , 2012 .

[45]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.  Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness , 2006 .

[47]  A. Farina,et al.  From Umwelt to Soundtope: An Epistemological Essay on Cognitive Ecology , 2013, Biosemiotics.