RDoC: Translating promise into progress.

As highlighted by articles in the current special issue, the RDoC initiative holds promise for advancing understanding of mental health problems. However, the initiative is at its early stages and it remains unclear what level of progress can be achieved and how quickly. In this closing article, we identify major challenges facing RDoC and propose concrete approaches to addressing these challenges, including (a) clearer specification of clinical problems for study, with use of symptom dimensions from integrative dimensional models of psychopathology as provisional, modifiable referents; (b) encouragement of research on a distinct set of traits corresponding to process constructs from the RDoC matrix-those represented across animal, child temperament, and adult personality literatures-to serve as interfaces between matrix constructs and clinical problems; (c) an emphasis in the near term on use of proximal units of analysis in RDoC studies-in particular, on physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures of matrix constructs (examined as states or traits, or both); (d) inclusion of a clear ontogenetic-developmental component in RDoC research projects; (e) routine analysis of the psychometric properties of nonreport (e.g., physiological, task-behavioral) variables, including systematic evaluation of their reliability and convergent-discriminant validity; (f) modification of existing grant review criteria to prioritize replication and synergy in RDoC investigative work; and (g) creation of a cumulative data network system (RDoC-DataWeb) to encourage and facilitate coordination of research efforts across RDoC research groups.

[1]  David Watson,et al.  The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies , 2017, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  Bruce N Cuthbert,et al.  The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[3]  C. Patrick,et al.  Psychoneurometric operationalization of threat sensitivity: Relations with clinical symptom and physiological response criteria. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[4]  R. Kotov,et al.  Error-related negativity (ERN) and sustained threat: Conceptual framework and empirical evaluation in an adolescent sample. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[5]  J. Ford Studying auditory verbal hallucinations using the RDoC framework. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[7]  A. Gloster,et al.  Panic disorder with agoraphobia from a behavioral neuroscience perspective: Applying the research principles formulated by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[8]  W. Gehring,et al.  The NIMH Research Domain Criteria initiative and error-related brain activity. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[9]  W. Hopkins,et al.  Displacement behaviors in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): A neurogenomics investigation of the RDoC Negative Valence Systems domain. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[10]  R. Krueger,et al.  The RDoC initiative and the structure of psychopathology. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  RDoC, DSM, and the reflex physiology of fear: A biodimensional analysis of the anxiety disorders spectrum. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Roman Kotov The quantitative classification of mental illness: Emerging solution to boundary problems. , 2016 .

[13]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Whither Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)?: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  H. Kraemer Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and the DSM--Two Methodological Approaches to Mental Health Diagnosis. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[15]  James R. Yancey,et al.  Aversive startle potentiation and fear pathology: Mediating role of threat sensitivity and moderating impact of depression. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  T. Piersma,et al.  An ontogenetic perspective on individual differences , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  W. Iacono,et al.  The Power of Theory, Research Design, and Transdisciplinary Integration in Moving Psychopathology Forward , 2015, Psychological inquiry.

[18]  C. Patrick,et al.  Separate and interactive contributions of weak inhibitory control and threat sensitivity to prediction of suicide risk , 2015, Psychiatry Research.

[19]  A. Wright,et al.  A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits , 2015, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Enhanced error-related brain activity in children predicts the onset of anxiety disorders between the ages of 6 and 9. , 2015, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  M. Rietschel,et al.  Neural and cognitive correlates of the common and specific variance across externalizing problems in young adolescence. , 2014, The American journal of psychiatry.

[22]  Scott O Lilienfeld,et al.  The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): an analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. , 2014, Behaviour research and therapy.

[23]  T. Insel,et al.  A Neurodevelopmental Perspective on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[24]  P. McGuire,et al.  Consistent etiology of severe, frequent psychotic experiences and milder, less frequent manifestations: a twin study of specific psychotic experiences in adolescence. , 2014, JAMA psychiatry.

[25]  B. Hicks,et al.  Personality and Psychopathology: A Stagnant Field in Need of Development , 2014, European journal of personality.

[26]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  A new life-span approach to conscientiousness and health: combining the pieces of the causal puzzle. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[27]  C. Patrick,et al.  Optimizing efficiency of psychopathology assessment through quantitative modeling: development of a brief form of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory. , 2013, Psychological assessment.

[28]  Mike Angstadt,et al.  Test-retest reliability of amygdala response to emotional faces. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Tim P. Moran,et al.  On the relationship between anxiety and error monitoring: a meta-analysis and conceptual framework , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Marra,et al.  The evaluation of sources of knowledge underlying different conceptual categories , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  James R. Yancey,et al.  A construct-network approach to bridging diagnostic and physiological domains: application to assessment of externalizing psychopathology. , 2013, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[33]  H. Pashler,et al.  Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  P. Sham,et al.  Heritability of hallucinations in adolescent twins , 2012, Psychiatry Research.

[35]  D. Watson,et al.  Erratum: Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5 (Psychological Medicine (2011) doi:10.1017/ S0033291711002674) , 2012 .

[36]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and Validation of New Anxiety and Bipolar Symptom Scales for an Expanded Version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II) , 2012, Assessment.

[37]  William J. Gehring,et al.  The Error-Related Negativity (ERN/Ne) , 2011 .

[38]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[39]  C. Patrick,et al.  Patterns of comorbidity among mental disorders: a person-centered approach. , 2011, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[40]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Excess significance bias in the literature on brain volume abnormalities. , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[41]  Kelly C. Cukrowicz,et al.  The interpersonal theory of suicide. , 2010, Psychological review.

[42]  S. Cichon,et al.  Genomewide association studies: history, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders. , 2009, The American journal of psychiatry.

[43]  J. Brooks Why most published research findings are false: Ioannidis JP, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece , 2008 .

[44]  Stephen D. Benning,et al.  Linking antisocial behavior, substance use, and personality: an integrative quantitative model of the adult externalizing spectrum. , 2007, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[45]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS). , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[46]  D. Watson Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: a quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  J. Ioannidis Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. , 2005, JAMA.

[48]  Jessica S. Brown,et al.  The psychology and neurobiology of suicidal behavior. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  C. Patrick,et al.  Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[50]  Personality and psychopathology in late life. , 1998, Geriatrics.

[51]  J. Schulkin,et al.  From normal fear to pathological anxiety. , 1998, Psychological review.

[52]  D. van Gend The hollow men. , 1998, The Human life review.

[53]  S Dunn,et al.  Cargo cult science. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[54]  Dante Cicchetti,et al.  Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology , 1996, Development and Psychopathology.

[55]  W. Mischel Personality and Assessment , 1996 .

[56]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain. Doctrine of multilevel analysis. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[57]  R. Larsen,et al.  Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  I Marks,et al.  Hypnotics and anxiolytics , 1983, British medical journal.

[60]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  Specific Etiology and Other Forms of Strong Influence: Some Quantitative Meanings , 1977 .

[61]  Richard Phillips Feynman,et al.  Cargo Cult Science , 1974 .

[62]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Fear reduction and fear behavior: Problems in treating a construct. , 1968 .

[63]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  J. Loevinger,et al.  Monograph Supplement 9 OBJECTIVE TESTS AS INSTRUMENTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY1 , 1957 .

[65]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  G. Āllport Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .

[67]  F. R. Lillie THE GENE AND THE ONTOGENETIC PROCESS. , 1927, Science.