Can Consumers Experience Ownership for Their Personal Data?From Issues of Scope and Invisibility to Agents Handling Our Digital Blueprints

In the age of information, everything becomes mined for the nuggets giving rise to it—data. Yet, to whom these new treasures do and should belong to is still being hotly debated. With individuals often acting as the source of the ore and businesses acting as the miners, both appear to hold a claim. This chapter contributes to this debate by analyzing whether and when personal data may evoke a sense of ownership in those they are about. Juxtaposing insights on the experience and functions of ownership with the essence of data and practices in data markets, we conclude that a very large fraction of personal data defies the logic and mechanisms of psychological possessions. In the canon of reasons for this defeat, issues of data characteristics, obscuring market practices, and data’s mere scope are center stage. In response, we propose to condense the boundless collection of data points into the singularized and graspable metaphor of a digital blueprint of the self. This metaphor is suggested to grasp the notion of personal data. To also enable consumers to effectively manage their data, we advocate adopting a practice commonly used with plentiful assets: the establishment of personal data agents and managers.

[1]  J. Greeno.  Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  Grant Mccracken.  Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[3]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Hide and Seek: Costly Consumer Privacy in a Market with Repeat Purchases , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[4]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  EMPLOYEES THAT THINK AND ACT LIKE OWNERS: EFFECTS OF OWNERSHIP BELIEFS AND BEHAVIORS ON ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS , 2003 .

[5]  Herb Childress,et al.  Teenagers, Territory and the Appropriation of Space , 2004 .

[6]  B. Kamleitner.  A Metaphorical Synthesis of the Impact of Ownership on Consumer Behavior , 2014 .

[7]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Celebrity Contagion and the Value of Objects , 2011 .

[8]  J. Sartre,et al.  Being and nothingness : a phenomenological essay on ontology , 1992 .

[9]  Valentin Zacharias,et al.  Applying quantified self approaches to support reflective learning , 2012, LAK.

[10]  Vijay Erramilli,et al.  Your browsing behavior for a big mac: economics of personal information online , 2011, WWW.

[11]  Robert E. Crossler,et al.  Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[12]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Personal Data: Thinking Inside the Box , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[13]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[14]  Sören Preibusch,et al.  Price versus privacy: an experiment into the competitive advantage of collecting less personal information , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res..

[15]  Nadezhda Purtova,et al.  The illusion of personal data as no one's property , 2015 .

[16]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  What Is Privacy Worth? , 2013, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[17]  Lita Furby,et al.  The Origins and Early Development of Possessive Behavior , 1980 .

[18]  Mihaela Popescu,et al.  Big data analytics and the limits of privacy self-management , 2017, New Media Soc..

[19]  Nancy S. Kim,et al.  A proximity effect in adults’ contamination intuitions , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  L. Jean Camp,et al.  Peer-produced privacy protection , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS): Social Implications of Wearable Computing and Augmediated Reality in Everyday Life.

[21]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others , 2006 .

[22]  Mike Molesworth,et al.  Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement , 2016, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[23]  Amitai Etzioni.  The Privacy Merchants: What is to Be Done? , 2012 .

[24]  B. Pelham,et al.  Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self-regulation. , 2002 .

[25]  Harald Weston.  Data Analytics as Predictor of Character or Virtues, and the Risks to Autonomy , 2016 .

[26]  Caglar Irmak,et al.  The Endowment Effect as Self-Enhancement in Response to Threat , 2013 .

[27]  Joshua A. Hicks,et al.  Death, Life, Scarcity, and Value: An Alternative Perspective on the Meaning of Death , 2009, Psychological science.

[28]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Personal data markets , 2015, Electron. Mark..

[29]  B. Loken.  Consumer psychology: categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Jin Chen,et al.  Information Privacy Concern About Peer Disclosure in Online Social Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  Carsten Ochs,et al.  Do-It-Yourself Data Protection—Empowerment or Burden? , 2016 .

[32]  Madison L. Pesowski,et al.  Identical but not interchangeable: Preschoolers view owned objects as non-fungible , 2016, Cognition.

[33]  Jon L. Pierce,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Development of Ownership Feelings , 2014 .

[34]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls , 2013 .

[35]  Julie E. Cohen.  Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object , 2000 .

[36]  E. Dijk,et al.  Wanna trade? Product knowledge and the perceived differences between the gains and losses of trade , 2005 .

[37]  J. Stigler,et al.  The laws of sympathetic magic , 1990 .

[38]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test , 2013 .

[39]  Heribert Gierl,et al.  Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumption , 2010 .

[40]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Privacy Languages: Are we there yet to enable user controls? , 2016, WWW.

[41]  B. Hood,et al.  The effect of labour on ownership decisions in two cultures: developmental evidence from Japan and the United Kingdom. , 2014, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[42]  Gina Brown,et al.  Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt , 2012 .

[43]  James B. Avey,et al.  Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes , 2009, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[44]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[45]  Weston L. Baxter,et al.  A psychological ownership approach to designing object attachment , 2015 .

[46]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Gone in 15 Seconds: The Limits of Privacy Transparency and Control , 2013, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[47]  A. Chemero.  An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[48]  Dawn Nafus,et al.  This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice , 2014 .

[49]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning Rhetoric , 2015, MIS Q..

[50]  J. Peck,et al.  The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership , 2009 .

[51]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Towards a value theory for personal data , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  York Hagmayer,et al.  Categories and causality: The neglected direction , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Ori Friedman,et al.  Children and Adults Use Gender and Age Stereotypes in Ownership Judgments , 2014 .

[54]  Kent Grayson,et al.  Indexicality and the Verification Function of Irreplaceable Possessions: A Semiotic Analysis , 2000 .

[55]  Shu Li,et al.  The Territorial Prior-Residence Effect and Children's Behavior in Social Dilemmas , 2009 .

[56]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Information bazaar: a contextual evaluation , 2013, HotPlanet '13.

[57]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Networks of Control: A Report on Corporate Surveillance, Digital Tracking, Big Data & Privacy , 2016 .

[58]  Patty Kostkova,et al.  Who Owns the Data? Open Data for Healthcare , 2016, Front. Public Health.

[59]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Privacy and human behavior in the age of information , 2015, Science.

[60]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research , 2003 .

[61]  O. Friedman,et al.  Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership , 2015 .

[62]  Bernadette Kamleitner,et al.  “As if It Were Mine”: Imagery Works by Inducing Psychological Ownership , 2015 .

[63]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Online privacy as a collective phenomenon , 2014, COSN '14.

[64]  A. Shaw,et al.  Ideas versus labor: What do children value in artistic creation? , 2013, Cognition.

[65]  Fanglin Chen,et al.  StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones , 2014, UbiComp.

[66]  Doan T. Le,et al.  Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility , 2012, Cognition.

[67]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  L. Furby.  Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. , 1978 .

[69]  Marsha L. Richins.  Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values , 1994 .

[70]  Curtis R. Taylor,et al.  The Economics of Privacy , 2016 .

[71]  Mimmi Sjöklint,et al.  The measurable me: the influence of self-quantification on the online user's decision-making process , 2014, ISWC '14 Adjunct.

[72]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Your Location has been Shared 5,398 Times!: A Field Study on Mobile App Privacy Nudging , 2015, CHI.

[73]  Christopher Rees,et al.  Who Owns Our Data? , 2013 .

[74]  Bernadette Kamleitner,et al.  Payment method and perceptions of ownership , 2013 .

[75]  R. Belk.  The ineluctable mysteries of possessions. , 1991 .

[76]  The Psychology of Perception: A Philosophical Examination of Gestalt Theory and Derivative Theories of Perception , 1958 .

[77]  Jon L. Pierce,et al.  Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application , 2011 .

[78]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[79]  Ernst Prelinger,et al.  Extension and Structure of the Self , 1959 .

[80]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  An Online Survey Experiment on Ambiguity and Privacy , 2012 .

[81]  Meredith Render,et al.  The Concept of Property , 2017 .

[82]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Misplaced Confidences , 2013, WEIS.

[83]  O. Friedman,et al.  If I am free, you can’t own me: Autonomy makes entities less ownable , 2016, Cognition.

[84]  Zhen Huang,et al.  PScout: analyzing the Android permission specification , 2012, CCS.

[85]  J. M. Nuttin.  Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages , 1987 .

[86]  Jeffrey Rosen,et al.  The Right to Be Forgotten , 2012 .

[87]  Jacob A. Benfield,et al.  Territorial markings as a predictor of driver aggression and road rage , 2008 .

[88]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  The evolution of private property , 2007 .

[89]  Paul Rozin,et al.  The Contagion Concept in Adult Thinking in the United States: Transmission of Germs and of Interpersonal Influence , 1994 .

[90]  Yu Pu,et al.  Towards a Model on the Factors Influencing Social App Users’ Valuation of Interdependent Privacy , 2016, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[91]  Nancy J. King,et al.  Data analytics and consumer profiling: Finding appropriate privacy principles for discovered data , 2016, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..