Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task

Abstract Prehension in adults is a highly developed motor skill that affords the study of how components of a movement are coordinated to produce the near endless variety of acts that serve to acquire objects in near body space. This study used three-dimensional movement analysis to describe the kinematic characteristics and coordination of the transport (the reach) and the manipulation (the grasp) components of prehension. Six subjects reached for and grasped 10 different sized wooden disks. Results indicated that the initial phase of the prehension movement could be considered as structured in advance of the movement in that, over the ten disk sizes, time of limb transport was a constant up to peak deceleration. The time after peak deceleration to object contact, however, increased as disk size decreased. This led to the movement trajectories being uniquely shaped for each disk size and as such did not support a proportional duration based model of motor programming. Other findings indicated that maximum grip aperture was reached progressively sooner as disk size was decreased and that maximum grip aperture was highly related to the size of the to-be-grasped disk. In terms of the coordination between the transport and grasp components, support was not found for a temporal linkage between them nor did their coordination appear to be dependent on a motor program. Rather, from an analysis of the spatial variability of the transport and grasp components, evidence was found for supporting the idea that the coordination between these two components was achieved by a sensorimotor process. Through this process, and given the goal of a prehension movement, it was argued that the two components are linked functionally rather than temporally or spatially. These results are discussed in terms of current sensorimotor models of motor control and prehension.

[1]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[2]  H. P. Birmingham,et al.  Studies of tracking behavior; the acceleration pattern of quick manual corrective responses. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[6]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movement Trajectories in Fitts' Task: Implications for Control , 1987 .

[7]  L. Carlton,et al.  Movement control characteristics of aiming responses. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[8]  Mike Anderson,et al.  Motor control in dart throwing , 1986 .

[9]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  C L MacKenzie,et al.  Motor skill: feedback, knowledge, and structural issues. , 1985, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[13]  M. Arbib Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[14]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Arbib,et al.  Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements , 1986 .

[17]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  M A Arbib,et al.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[20]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.