Random Effects Models for Personal Networks

We propose analyzing personal or ego-centered network data by means of two-level generalized linear models. The approach is illustrated with an example in which we assess whether personal networks are homogenous with respect to marital status after controlling for age homogeneity. In this example, the outcome variable is a bivariate categorical response variable (alter’s marital status and age category). We apply both factor-analytic parametric and latent-class-based nonparametric random effects models and compare the results obtained with the two approaches. The proposed models can be estimated with the Latent GOLD program for latent class analysis.

[1]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[2]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Generalized latent variable models: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models , 2004 .

[3]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[4]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Concomitant Variable Latent Class Models for the External Analysis of Choice Data , 1992 .

[5]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Love, necessity and opportunity: Changing patterns of marital age homogamy in the Netherlands, 1850–1993 , 2001 .

[7]  M. V. Valkenburg.  Network Analysis , 1964 .

[8]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Encyclopedia of gerontology : age, aging, and the aged , 1997 .

[9]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[10]  J. Vermunt.  Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression Models for Indirectly Observed Discrete Outcome Variables , 2005, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  M. Kalmijn.  Status Homogamy in the United States , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  M. Aitkin.  A General Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Variance Components in Generalized Linear Models , 1999, Biometrics.

[13]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  MULTILEVEL MODELLING NEWSLETTER , 2002 .

[15]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  A nonparametric random-coefficients approach : The latest class regression model , 2001 .

[16]  D. Hedeker.  A mixed‐effects multinomial logistic regression model , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[18]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[19]  P. Róbert,et al.  Bivariate and multivariate scaled association models. An application to homogamy of social origin and education in Hungary between 1930 and 1979 , 1996, Quality and Quantity.

[20]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Measuring age as a structural concept , 1991 .

[21]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[22]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  Homophily and Social Distance in the Choice of Multiple Friends an Analysis Based on Conditionally Symmetric Log-Bilinear Association Models , 1990 .

[23]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[24]  J. Gerich,et al.  Collection of ego-centered network data with computer-assisted interviews. , 2006 .

[25]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Concomitant Variable Latent Class Models for Conjoint Analysis , 1994 .

[26]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[27]  Michael Hout,et al.  How 4.5 Million Irish Immigrants Became 40 Million Irish Americans: Demographic and Subjective Aspects of the Ethnic Composition of White Americans. , 1994 .

[28]  L. A. Goodman.  The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I-A Modified Latent Structure Approach , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .