Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity

Visual working memory (VWM) is used to maintain sensory information for cognitive operations, and its deficits are associated with several neuropsychological disorders. VWM is based on sustained neuronal activity in a complex cortical network of frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal areas. The neuronal mechanisms that coordinate this distributed processing to sustain coherent mental images and the mechanisms that set the behavioral capacity limit have remained unknown. We mapped the anatomical and dynamic structures of network synchrony supporting VWM by using a neuro informatics approach and combined magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Interareal phase synchrony was sustained and stable during the VWM retention period among frontoparietal and visual areas in α- (10–13 Hz), β- (18–24 Hz), and γ- (30–40 Hz) frequency bands. Furthermore, synchrony was strengthened with increasing memory load among the frontoparietal regions known to underlie executive and attentional functions during memory maintenance. On the other hand, the subjects’ individual behavioral VWM capacity was predicted by synchrony in a network in which the intraparietal sulcus was the most central hub. These data suggest that interareal phase synchrony in the α-, β-, and γ-frequency bands among frontoparietal and visual regions could be a systems level mechanism for coordinating and regulating the maintenance of neuronal object representations in VWM.

[1]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J E Lisman,et al.  Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles , 1995, Science.

[3]  A Baddeley,et al.  The fractionation of working memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Induced γ-Band Activity during the Delay of a Visual Short-Term Memory Task in Humans , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  H. Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Pernier,et al.  Induced gamma-band activity during the delay of a visual short-term memory task in humans. , 1998, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  J. D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[10]  T. Poggio,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object recognition , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  J. Lisman,et al.  Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory fMRI Amplitude Predicts Task Performance , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  R. Passingham,et al.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  N. Busch,et al.  Object-load and feature-load modulate EEG in a short-term memory task , 2003, Neuroreport.

[17]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004, Nature.

[18]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  J. Palva,et al.  Phase Synchrony among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Desimone,et al.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection , 2006, Nature.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[25]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Theta and Gamma Oscillations Predict Encoding and Retrieval of Declarative Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[27]  W. Singer,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization , 2007, Science.

[28]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[32]  E. Formisano,et al.  Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8-13 Hz during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[34]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[35]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[36]  S. Kastner,et al.  Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Adriano B. L. Tort,et al.  Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of local field potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Temporal Interactions between Cortical Rhythms , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[41]  A. Engel,et al.  Neuronal Synchronization along the Dorsal Visual Pathway Reflects the Focus of Spatial Attention , 2008, Neuron.

[42]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Stephen J. Gotts,et al.  High-frequency, Long-range Coupling between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex during Sustained Attention , 2022 .

[46]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses , 2009, Nature.

[47]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[48]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance , 2009, NeuroImage.

[49]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks , 2009, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[50]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[52]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  The roles of gamma-band oscillatory synchrony in human visual cognition. , 2009, Frontiers in bioscience.

[53]  A. Karim,et al.  Brain Oscillatory Substrates of Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity , 2009, Current Biology.

[54]  P. Fries Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[55]  J. Matias Palva,et al.  Graph properties of synchronized cortical networks during visual working memory maintenance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[56]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.