Integrated assessment of future CAP policies: land use changes, spatial patterns and targeting

The recent and upcoming reforms of the Common Agricultural Policies (CAPs) aim at strengthening the multifunctional role of agriculture, acknowledging the differences in economic, environmental and social potentials within European regions. This paper presents results from an integrated assessment of existing and future policies within the framework set up in the FP6 EU project MEA-Scope. Spatial explicit procedures allow for the MEA-Scope modelling tools to provide information related to regional, environmental and socio-economics settings. The impact of different policy scenarios on structural change, land abandonment and cropping pattern of typical farms has been assessed based on linked agent-based (ABM) and Linear Programming (LP) models at regional and farm scale for two study areas. For the German case study area Ostprignitz-Ruppin (OPR), the issue of policy targeting has been addressed by relating non-commodity outputs (NCOs) to soil quality and protection status. For the Italian case study area (Mugello), changes in landscape patterns in terms of increased fragmentation or homogeneity as affected by changes in agricultural intensity have been analysed using semivariance analysis. The spatial explicit approach highlighted the relevance of case study research in order to identifying response structures and explaining policy implementation patterns.

[1]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services , 2007 .

[4]  Patrick Bogaert,et al.  Spatial analysis and modelling of land use distributions in Belgium , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[5]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change : local processes and global impacts , 2010 .

[6]  A. Ernoult,et al.  Patterns of organisation in changing landscapes: implications for the management of biodiversity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  K. Helming,et al.  Ex-ante Impact Assessments (IA) in the European Commission — an overview , 2008 .

[8]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  Computers, Environment and Urban Systems , 2009 .

[9]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Methodological issues of modelling farm and landscape scale indicators for sustainable land systems , 2006 .

[10]  Kathrin Happe,et al.  CAP-reform and the provision of non-commodity outputs in Brandenburg Die Auswirkung der EU-Agrarreform auf multifunktionale Landwirtschaft in Brandenburg , 2006 .

[11]  P. Zander,et al.  Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development , 1999 .

[12]  C. Grundmann.  Humboldt‐Universität Berlin , 1950 .

[13]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Land-Use and Land-Cover Change , 2006 .

[14]  Kathrin Happe,et al.  Agricultural management issues of implementing multifunctionality: commodity and non-commodity production in the approach of the MEA-Scope project , 2007 .

[15]  Peter Zander,et al.  Determination of trade-off-functions to analyse the provision of agricultural non-commodities , 2006 .

[16]  R. Pontius,et al.  Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change , 2006 .

[17]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The future of rural Europe : An anthology based on the results of the Eururalis 2.0 scenario study , 2008 .

[18]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[19]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of land use policies , 2008 .

[20]  S. Tangermann,et al.  THE FUTURE OF DIRECT PAYMENTS UNDER THE CAP: A PROPOSAL , 2001 .

[21]  Y. R. Waarts.  Indicators for agricultural policy impact assessment the case of multifunctional beef production , 2007 .

[22]  K. Happe,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Empirical based agent-based modeling Agent-based Analysis of Agricultural Policies: an Illustration of the Agricultural Policy Simulator AgriPoliS, its Adaptation and Behavior , 2006 .

[23]  Alfons Balmann,et al.  Does structure matter? The impact of switching the agricultural policy regime on farm structures , 2008 .