Special Theme of Research in Information Systems Analysis and Design-IV Evaluation Criteria for Information Systems Development Methodologies

The evaluation of information systems development methodologies is becoming increasingly important. Some researchers propose their own criteria for conceptual evaluations. But such criteria are often constrained by the limitation of the researcher’s view toward and experience with development methodologies. Furthermore, existing evaluation criteria are either not practical for direct measurement or not tested for validity and reliability. The lack of a generally acceptable, practically valid, and reliable set of criteria for evaluation hinders the development of knowledge in this area. Our study is a step toward developing a systematic process to evaluate information systems development methodologies. We captured the opinions of a group of twenty-eight researchers and practitioners who are experienced in information systems development methodologies. Through a systematic content analysis, the authors classified these criteria into three categories: (1) methodology design, (2) methodology use, and (3) methodology deliverables. The three categories of criteria are not totally separate in that they represent the means and goals of information systems development methodologies. Appropriate criteria should be applied depending on the stages when evaluation is performed.

[1]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[2]  Peter Smith,et al.  Results of survey of use of SSADM in commercial and government sectors in United Kingdom , 1989 .

[3]  Nimal Jayaratna,et al.  Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework , 1994 .

[4]  Janis A. Bubenko,et al.  Information System Methodologies - A Research View , 1986, Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice.

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Industrial companies' evaluation criteria in new product development gates , 2003 .

[6]  Christiane Floyd,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of System Development Methods , 1986, Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice.

[7]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  System Development Methodologies: Unanswered Questions and the Research-Practice Gap , 1993, ICIS.

[8]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Keng Siau,et al.  Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modeling Methods , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[10]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Learning failure in information systems development , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Systems development methodologies: unanswered questions , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  The Brainstorming Myth , 2000 .

[13]  Delvin Grant,et al.  A report on the use of action research to evaluate a manufacturing information systems development methodology in a company , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  C. P. Catchpole Information systems design for the community health services , 1987 .

[15]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[16]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information systems research : contemporary approaches & emergent traditions : proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG 8.2 Working Conference on the Information Systems Research Arena of the 90's Challenges, Perceptions, and Alternative Approaches : Copenhagen, Denmark, 14-16 December 1990 , 1991 .

[17]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Where now for development methodologies? , 2003, CACM.

[18]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  Matti Rossi,et al.  Method engineering: current research directions and implications for future research , 1996 .

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[22]  Keng Siau,et al.  Evaluation of information modeling methods-a review , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Sasa M. Dekleva,et al.  The Influence of the Information Systems Development Approach on Maintenance , 1992, MIS Q..

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions , 1987, CSUR.

[25]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Criteria for contractor selection , 1997 .

[26]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Segment Selection Procedure for Industrial Product Markets , 1999 .

[27]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[28]  Peter Aiken,et al.  Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1997 .

[29]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis , 1983 .

[30]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review , 1983 .

[31]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[32]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  New challenges of systems development: a vision of the 90's , 1989, DATB.

[33]  A. Dennis,et al.  When a Group Is Not a Group , 1993 .

[34]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Unblocking brainstorms. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.