Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height.

This study used a computer simulation model to investigate various considerations that affect optimum peak height in a running jump. A planar eight-segment computer simulation model with extensor and flexor torque generators at five joints was formulated and customised to an elite male high jumper. A simulation was matched to a recorded high jumping performance by varying the activation profiles of each of the torque generators giving a simulated peak height of 1.99m compared to the recorded performance of 2.01 m. In order to maximise the peak height reached by the mass centre in the flight phase, the activation profiles were varied, keeping the same initial conditions as in the matching simulation. Optimisations were carried out without any constraints, with constraints on the angular momentum at take-off, with further constraints on joint angles, and with additional requirements of robustness to perturbations of activation timings. A peak height of 2.37 m was achieved in the optimisation without constraints. Introducing the three constraints in turn resulted in peak heights of 2.21, 2.14 and 1.99m. With all three types of constraints included, the peak height was similar to that achieved in the recorded performance. It is concluded that such considerations have a substantial influence on optimum technique and must be included in studies using optimised simulations.

[1]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  Sensitivity of vertical jumping performance to changes in muscle stimulation onset times: a simulation study , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Evaluation of a torque-driven model of jumping for height. , 2006, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[3]  Jean E. Ness,et al.  The High Jump , 1989 .

[4]  M. Yeadon The simulation of aerial movement--I. The determination of orientation angles from film data. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Matt Greig,et al.  The Influence of Touchdown Parameters on the Performance of a High Jumper , 2000 .

[6]  Jane M. Cappaert,et al.  A Regression Analysis of High Jumping Technique , 1990 .

[7]  K. Newell Coordination, Control and Skill , 1985 .

[8]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Optimum take-off techniques for high and long jumps. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Mark A King,et al.  Determination of subject-specific model parameters for visco-elastic elements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  James G Hay,et al.  Computer simulation of the last support phase of the long jump. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  G. Street Biomechanics IX-B , 1985 .

[12]  M. Yeadon The simulation of aerial movement--II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  L. Jennings,et al.  On the use of spline functions for data smoothing. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  James Johnson,et al.  High jump , 1994, Nature.

[15]  Sung Gyoo Park Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise , 1981 .

[16]  J. Dapena,et al.  Vertical and radial motions of the body during the take-off phase of high jumping. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  H. Whiting,et al.  Motor development in children : aspects of coordination and control , 1986 .

[18]  Mark A. King,et al.  Modelling Differential Activation of Knee Joint Extensors , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport.

[19]  Mark A King,et al.  Modelling the maximum voluntary joint torque/angular velocity relationship in human movement. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Blake M. Ashby,et al.  Optimal control simulations reveal mechanisms by which arm movement improves standing long jump performance. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  W S Levine,et al.  An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  John Loxton,et al.  Developments in Close Range Photogrammetry–1 , 1982 .

[23]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[24]  Sandro Ridella,et al.  Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the “simulated annealing” algorithmCorrigenda for this article is available here , 1987, TOMS.

[25]  J H Rankin,et al.  The construction and usefulness of physical models of the placenta. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  A. Schwab,et al.  The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical-jumping achievement. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  M. R. Yeawn THE SIMULATION OF AERIAL MOVEMENT-III. THE DETERMINATION OF THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1989 .

[28]  M. Smyth Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control : D. Goodman, R. Wilberg and I. Franks (eds.) (Advances in Psychology series.) Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985 , 1986 .

[29]  M. R. Yeadon,et al.  A method for synchronising digitised video data. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[31]  M F Bobbert,et al.  A control strategy for the execution of explosive movements from varying starting positions. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .