Political decentralization and technological innovation: testing the innovative advantages of decentralized states

Although never rigorously tested, it has become a sort of accepted wisdom amongst social scientists that government decentralization offers key advantages for innovators. Decentralized governments are widely seen as agile, competitive, and well structured to adapt to innovation’s gale of creative destruction. Meanwhile, centralized states, even when democratic, have come to be viewed as rigid and thus hostile to the risks, costs, and change associated with new technology; or are subject to capture by status-quo interest groups which use their influence to promote policies which ultimately restrict technological change. Therefore decentralized government is often perceived as a necessary institutional foundation for encouraging long-run technological innovation. In the following article, this wisdom is tested using data on international patent activity, scientific publications, and high-technology exports. The results suggest that the supposed technological advantages of decentralized states are a fiction, and that international pressures may be more important.

[1]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[2]  S. Cutler A Review of the Statistical Evidence on the Association Between Smoking and Lung Cancer , 1955 .

[3]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Holland Hunter,et al.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective , 1963 .

[5]  Lawrence R. Klein An Introduction To Econometrics , 1962 .

[6]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[7]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[8]  W. Cary Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware , 1974 .

[9]  H. Theil Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[10]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[11]  John F. Guilmartin,et al.  The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 by William H. McNeill (review) , 1984 .

[12]  S. Hacker,et al.  Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience , 1986 .

[13]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transforma-tion of the Industrial World , 1987 .

[14]  Merritt Roe Smith,et al.  "Military enterprise and technological change - perspectives on the American experience", Merritt Roe Smith, Londyn : [recenzja] / Andrzej Rzepniewski. , 1987 .

[15]  Richard J. Samuels,et al.  The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective . By Richard J. Samuels (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987. xii, 359p. $45.00, cloth; $14.95, paper). , 1987, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[16]  Randy Shilts And the band played on : politics, people, and the AIDS epidemic , 1988 .

[17]  Andrew Gamble,et al.  The pursuit of power , 1988 .

[18]  P. Hall,et al.  Governing the economy : the politics of state intervention in Britain and France , 1988 .

[19]  A. Gelb Oil Windfalls: Blessing or Curse? , 1988 .

[20]  E. Wolff,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico , 1989 .

[21]  Luc Soete,et al.  The economics of technical change and international trade , 1994 .

[22]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[23]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[24]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. , 1991 .

[25]  K. Yamamura,et al.  Transfer of Japanese Technology and Management to the Asean Countries , 1991 .

[26]  P. Carroll Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM , 1993 .

[27]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  G. Grossman,et al.  Technology and Trade , 1994 .

[29]  Barry R. Weingast The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development , 1995 .

[30]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[31]  J. Sachs,et al.  Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth , 1995 .

[32]  R. L. Watts Comparing federal systems , 1996 .

[33]  S. V. Evera Guide to methods for students of political science , 1997 .

[34]  Peter Daniels,et al.  National technology gaps and trade — an empirical study of the influence of globalisation , 1997 .

[35]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Federalism as a Commitment to Reserving Market Incentives , 1997 .

[36]  Christer Sjöström,et al.  State-of-the-art report , 1997 .

[37]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  Scientific publications, patents and technological capabilities in late-industrializing countries , 1997 .

[38]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[39]  Charles I. Jones Introduction to Economic Growth , 1997 .

[40]  T. J. Pempel Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy , 1998 .

[41]  Science in Tomorrow's Europe , 1998 .

[42]  David M. Woodruff Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism , 1999 .

[43]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[44]  Michael L. Ross,et al.  The Political Economy of the Resource Curse , 1999, World Politics.

[45]  Arend Lijphart Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[46]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[47]  D. Treisman Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity? , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[48]  Daniel Treisman,et al.  The causes of corruption: a cross-national study , 2000 .

[49]  Erik Wibbels Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance , 2000 .

[50]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[51]  R. D. Hamilton,et al.  Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry , 2000 .

[52]  Bennet A. Zelner,et al.  Published in: (2000) Economics and Politics 12(1):1-31 The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth , 2022 .

[53]  Witold J. Henisz,et al.  Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[54]  Bennet A. Zelner,et al.  The Institutional Environment for Telecommunications Investment , 2001 .

[55]  Jonathan Rodden The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance around the World , 2002 .

[56]  María C. Escobar-Lemmon Fiscal Decentralization and Federalism in Latin America , 2001 .

[57]  Daniel W. Drezner State structure, technological leadership and the maintenance of hegemony , 2001, Review of International Studies.

[58]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[59]  Witold J. Henisz The institutional environment for infrastructure investment , 2002 .

[60]  Erik Wibbels,et al.  Beyond the Fiction of Federalism: Macroeconomic Management in Multitiered Systems , 2002 .

[61]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[62]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[63]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth , 2005 .

[64]  M. Taylor Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation , 2004, International Organization.

[65]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[66]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth , 2005 .

[67]  Simon Johnson,et al.  Chapter 6 Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth , 2005 .

[68]  Jonathan Rodden Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism , 2005 .

[69]  Paul Bourke,et al.  Publication types, citation rates and evaluation , 1996, Scientometrics.

[70]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Technology, Information and the Decentralization of the Firm , 2006 .

[71]  Luke Keele,et al.  Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables , 2006, Political Analysis.

[72]  Dan Breznitz Innovation and the State , 2007 .