Consistent Energy-Based Atomistic/Continuum Coupling for Two-Body Potentials in One and Two Dimensions

This paper addresses the problem of consistent energy-based coupling of atomistic and continuum models of materials, limited to zero-temperature statics of simple crystals. It has been widely recognized that the most practical coupled methods exhibit large errors on the atomistic/continuum interface (which are often attributed to spurious forces called "ghost forces"). There are only few existing works that propose a coupling which is sufficiently accurate near the interface under certain limitations. In this paper a novel coupling that is free from "ghost forces" is proposed for a two-body interaction potential under the assumptions of either (i) one spatial dimension, or (ii) two spatial dimensions and piecewise affine finite elements for describing the continuum deformation. The performance of the proposed coupling is demonstrated with numerical experiments. The coupling strategy is based on judiciously defining the contributions of the atomistic bonds to the discrete and the continuum potential energy. The same method in one dimension has been independently developed and analyzed in Li and Luskin [IMA J. Numer. Anal, to appear].

[1]  Ronald E. Miller,et al.  The Quasicontinuum Method: Overview, applications and current directions , 2002 .

[2]  Christoph Ortner,et al.  Stability, Instability, and Error of the Force-based Quasicontinuum Approximation , 2009, 0903.0610.

[3]  Xingjie Helen Li,et al.  A Generalized Quasi-Nonlocal Atomistic-to-Continuum Coupling Method with Finite Range Interaction , 2010 .

[4]  Alexander V. Shapeev,et al.  Analysis of an energy-based atomistic/continuum approximation of a vacancy in the 2D triangular lattice , 2013, Math. Comput..

[5]  Patrick A. Klein,et al.  Coupled atomistic-continuum simulations using arbitrary overlapping domains , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  J. Q. Broughton,et al.  Concurrent coupling of length scales: Methodology and application , 1999 .

[7]  Siegfried Schmauder,et al.  A New Method for Coupled Elastic-Atomistic Modelling , 1989 .

[8]  L E Shilkrot,et al.  Coupled atomistic and discrete dislocation plasticity. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Christoph Ortner,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE PATCH TEST IN 2D ATOMISTIC-TO-CONTINUUM COUPLING METHODS ∗ , 2011, 1101.5256.

[11]  Tomotsugu Shimokawa,et al.  Matching conditions in the quasicontinuum method: Removal of the error introduced at the interface between the coarse-grained and fully atomistic region , 2004 .

[12]  Alexander V. Shapeev Consistent Energy-Based Atomistic/Continuum Coupling for Two-Body Potentials in Three Dimensions , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[13]  Alexander V. Shapeev,et al.  Analysis of an Energy-based Atomistic/Continuum Coupling Approximation of a Vacancy in the 2D Triangular Lattice , 2011 .

[14]  Christoph Ortner A priori and a posteriori analysis of the quasinonlocal quasicontinuum method in 1D , 2011, Math. Comput..

[15]  Alexander Stukowski,et al.  A variational formulation of the quasicontinuum method based on energy sampling in clusters , 2009 .

[16]  Christoph Ortner,et al.  Iterative Methods for the Force-based Quasicontinuum Approximation , 2009 .

[17]  J. Shewchuk An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without the Agonizing Pain , 1994 .

[18]  Mitchell Luskin,et al.  An Optimal Order Error Analysis of the One-Dimensional Quasicontinuum Approximation , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  Mark S. Shephard,et al.  Concurrent AtC coupling based on a blend of the continuum stress and the atomistic force , 2007 .

[20]  Mitchell Luskin,et al.  Error Estimation and Atomistic-Continuum Adaptivity for the Quasicontinuum Approximation of a Frenkel-Kontorova Model , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[21]  Ellad B. Tadmor,et al.  A unified framework and performance benchmark of fourteen multiscale atomistic/continuum coupling methods , 2009 .

[22]  Gregory J. Wagner,et al.  Coupling of atomistic and continuum simulations using a bridging scale decomposition , 2003 .

[23]  Etienne Emmrich,et al.  Multiscale methods coupling atomistic and continuum mechanics: some examples of mathematical analysis , 2009 .

[24]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids , 1996 .

[25]  O. Kastner,et al.  Molecular-dynamics of a 2D model of the shape memory effect , 2003 .

[26]  J. Molinari,et al.  Multiscale modeling of two-dimensional contacts. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Ping Lin,et al.  Energy-based ghost force removing techniques for the quasicontinuum method , 2009, 0909.5437.

[28]  Endre Süli,et al.  ANALYSIS OF A QUASICONTINUUM METHOD IN ONE DIMENSION , 2008 .

[29]  Christoph Ortner,et al.  Sharp Stability Estimates for the Force-Based Quasicontinuum Approximation of Homogeneous Tensile Deformation , 2010, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[30]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  Error Control for Molecular Statics Problems , 2006 .

[31]  Pingbing Ming,et al.  Analysis of a One-Dimensional Nonlocal Quasi-Continuum Method , 2009, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[32]  E Weinan,et al.  Uniform Accuracy of the Quasicontinuum Method , 2006, MRS Online Proceedings Library.

[33]  Christoph Ortner,et al.  Sharp Stability Estimates for the Force-based Quasicontinuum Method , 2009 .

[34]  M. Ortiz,et al.  An analysis of the quasicontinuum method , 2001, cond-mat/0103455.

[35]  M. Born,et al.  Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices , 1954 .

[36]  M. Ortiz,et al.  An adaptive finite element approach to atomic-scale mechanics—the quasicontinuum method , 1997, cond-mat/9710027.