The role of user firms in the innovation of machine tools: The Japanese case

Abstract This paper explores the role that user firms have played in shaping the innovation dynamics of machine tools. It develops the hypothesis that the users (i) create a basis for the specialised suppliers of machine tools to embark on a dynamic path to innovation through investment activities; (ii) become involved directly in the development and commercialisation of machine tools. The empirical findings from the Japanese case are as follows: (a) capital investment of user sectors has had a significant long-term impact on the innovation performance of the Japanese machine tool sector; (b) there have been continuous user entries into machine tools from the beginning of industrial development, prominently by car producers from the middle of the 1950s, and by electronics firms from the 1970s; (c) user firms have also participated vigourously in the innovation of machine tools.

[1]  D. F. Greer,et al.  Industrial Organization and Public Policy , 1980 .

[2]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  What Makes The Automation Industry Strategic , 1991 .

[3]  G. Stalk.  Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[4]  S Watanabe.  Market structure, industrial organisation and technological development: the case of the Japanese electronics-based nc-machine tool industry , 1983 .

[5]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  USES AND ABUSES OF PATENT STATISTICS , 1988 .

[6]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  The division of labour is limited by the type of market: The case of the Taiwanese machine tool industry , 1977 .

[7]  G. Stigler.  The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  G. Myrdal.  Economic theory and underdeveloped regions , 1965 .

[9]  L. Soete,et al.  TECHNOLOGY GAPS AND COST‐BASED ADJUSTMENT: SOME EXPLORATIONS ON THE DETERMINANTS OF INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS* , 1983 .

[10]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Accumulating Technological Capability in Developing Countries , 1992 .

[11]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[12]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[13]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[14]  R. Matthews.  Foreign Trade and British Economic Growth , 1973 .

[15]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Innovation and re‐innovation: A role for the user , 1986 .

[16]  B. Payne,et al.  Machine tool industry , 1985 .

[17]  N. Rosenberg.  Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[18]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[19]  Zong-Tae Bae,et al.  Technology development processes: A model for a developing country with a global perspective , 1988 .

[20]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Small-scale industry at a crossroads: U.S. Machine tools in Global perspective , 1989 .

[21]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The new product process: an empirically‐based classification scheme , 1983 .

[22]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance , 1987 .

[23]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  The innovation dynamics and technology cycles in the computer industry , 1984 .

[24]  Luc Soete,et al.  A general test of technological gap trade theory , 1981 .

[25]  Toshiaki Chokki.  A History of the Machine Tool Industry In Japan , 1986 .

[26]  Morris Teubal,et al.  On User Needs and Need Determination: Aspects of the Theory of Technological Innovation , 1979 .

[27]  Birger Rapp.  Models for optimal investment and maintenance decisions , 1974 .

[28]  M. Fransman.  Machinery and economic development , 1986 .

[29]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[30]  M. Bell.  ‘Learning’ and the Accumulation of Industrial Technological Capacity in Developing Countries , 1984 .

[31]  F. Scherer,et al.  Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited , 1982 .

[32]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[33]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Technological Capability in the Third World , 1984 .

[34]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance: Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress , 1987 .

[35]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-organisation Model , 1988 .

[36]  Ehud Zuscovitch,et al.  Networks and market creation , 1991 .

[37]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .

[38]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[39]  J. Fagerberg.  International Competitiveness: Errata , 1988 .

[40]  M. Baker,et al.  Industrial innovation : technology, policy, diffusion , 1979 .

[41]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Strategies of user-initiated product innovation , 1987 .

[42]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[43]  Frances Stewart.  Technology and underdevelopment , 1977 .

[44]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The International Distribution and Determinants of Technological Activities , 1988 .

[45]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[46]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The importance of the technological activities of the world's largest firms , 1990 .

[47]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Technological Innovation for a Dynamic Economy , 1980 .

[48]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Capital Goods Production in the Third World: An Economic Study of Technology Acquisition , 1984 .

[49]  Joe Tidd.  Flexible Manufacturing Technologies and International Competitiveness , 1991 .

[50]  Ravi Sarathy,et al.  The Interplay of Industrial Policy and International Strategy: Japan's Machine Tool Industry , 1989 .

[51]  Roderick Floud,et al.  The British Machine Tool Industry, 1850–1914 , 1976 .