Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.

Two experiments documented a phenomenon of duration neglect in people's global evaluations of past affective experiences. In Study 1, 32 Ss viewed aversive film clips and pleasant film clips that varied in duration and intensity. Ss provided real-time ratings of affect during each clip and global evaluations of each clip when it was over. In Study 2, 96 Ss viewed these same clips and later ranked them by their contribution to an overall experience of pleasantness (or unpleasantness). Experimental Ss ranked the films from memory; control Ss were informed of the ranking task in advance and encouraged to make evaluations on-line. Effects of film duration on retrospective evaluations were small, entirely explained by changes in real-time affect and further reduced when made from memory. Retrospective evaluations appear to be determined by a weighted average of "snapshots" of the actual affective experience, as if duration did not matter.

[1]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[2]  George S. Avrunin,et al.  Single-Peaked Functions and the Theory of Preference. , 1977 .

[3]  Carol Reich Models of Integration. , 1978 .

[4]  J. Gottman,et al.  Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Gottman,et al.  A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[7]  R. Levenson Emotion and the autonomic nervous system: A prospectus for research on autonomic specificity. , 1988 .

[8]  H. Wagner Social psychophysiology and emotion : theory and clinical applications , 1988 .

[9]  M. Ross,et al.  Women's theories of menstruation and biases in recall of menstrual symptoms. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Massaro,et al.  Models of integration given multiple sources of information. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Insights in decision making : a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn , 1990 .

[12]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Constructing and reconstructing the past and the future in the present. , 1990 .

[13]  D. Mackie,et al.  On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Preferences for separating or combining events. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Barbara L. Fredrickson,et al.  Anticipated endings: An explanation for selective social interaction. , 1991 .

[16]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Relative Weighting of Position and Velocity in Satisfaction , 1991 .

[17]  Yale Universih,et al.  THE RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF POSITION AND VELOCITY IN SATISFACTION , 1991 .

[18]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Velocity relation : satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time , 1991 .

[19]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[20]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes , 1992 .

[21]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[22]  D. Kahneman,et al.  When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End , 1993 .

[23]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  Preferences for sequences of outcomes. , 1993 .

[24]  P. Ekman,et al.  Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion , 1994 .