Field comparison of network Sun photometers

[1] Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid-1990s with the onset of commercially available, high-quality, low-maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for some, have further enhanced interest in the products this type of measurement can provide. With several networks operating globally and others operating either regionally or continentally within North America the comparability of the data emanating from the various archive centers is an important issue. The Bratt's Lake Observatory operates four separate types of Sun photometers in conjunction with three different networks: Aerosols in Canada, Global Atmosphere Watch, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture UV-B Monitoring Program. Data collected during the summer of 2001, following the protocols established by the networks and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were analyzed to determine the comparability among these networks. As the instruments and conversion algorithms are similar to other networks from around the globe, it is believed that the results of this comparison can be transferred, at least in part, to other operational networks. The results of the 3-month study indicate that the data obtained from the networks that operate direct-pointing instruments are very comparable, being within ±0.01 of an optical depth for instantaneous measurements during cloud-free line-of-sight conditions. Over the length of the comparison the root mean square difference of aerosol optical depth at 500 nm between the direct sun-pointing instruments was 0.0069. The rotating shadowband instruments did not perform as well. These results indicate that the data from well-maintained networks of direct sun-pointing photometers can provide data of the quality necessary to compare stations from across the globe.

[1]  B. Forgan,et al.  Aerosol Measurement in the Australian Outback: Intercomparison of Sun Photometers , 2003 .

[2]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Optical properties of boreal forest fire smoke derived from Sun photometry , 2002 .

[3]  G. Fedosejevs,et al.  Characterization of atmospheric aerosols across Canada from a ground‐based sunphotometer network: AEROCAN , 2001 .

[4]  A. Heimo,et al.  Aerosol optical depth measurements by means of a Sun photometer network in Switzerland , 2001 .

[5]  V. Cachorro,et al.  A quantitative comparison of α-Å turbidity parameter retrieved in different spectral ranges based on spectroradiometer solar radiation measurements , 2001 .

[6]  Nels S. Laulainen,et al.  Multiyear measurements of aerosol optical depth in the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement and Quantitative Links programs , 2001 .

[7]  T. Eck,et al.  An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET , 2001 .

[8]  T. Eck,et al.  Bimodal size distribution influences on the variation of Angstrom derivatives in spectral and optical depth space , 2001 .

[9]  C. Wehrli,et al.  Calibrations of filter radiometers for determination of atmospheric optical depth , 2000 .

[10]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .

[11]  Norman T. O'Neill,et al.  Aerosol Optical Depth for Atmospheric Correction of AVHRR Composite Data , 2000 .

[12]  T. Eck,et al.  Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[13]  T. Eck,et al.  Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols , 1999 .

[14]  J. Slusser,et al.  On Rayleigh Optical Depth Calculations , 1999 .

[15]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Comparison of aerosol optical depth from four solar radiometers during the fall 1997 ARM intensive observation period , 1999 .

[16]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[17]  J. Slusser,et al.  The USDA Ultraviolet Radiation Monitoring Program , 1998 .

[18]  J. Burrows,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC REMOTE-SENSING REFERENCE DATA FROM GOME — 2 . TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT ABSORPTION CROSS SECTIONS OF O 3 IN THE 231 — 794 NM RANGE , 1998 .

[19]  K. Chance,et al.  Ring effect studies: Rayleigh scattering, including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering, and the Fraunhofer spectrum. , 1997, Applied optics.

[20]  A. Bucholtz,et al.  Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere. , 1995, Applied optics.

[21]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Automated multifilter rotating shadow-band radiometer: an instrument for optical depth and radiation measurements. , 1994, Applied optics.

[22]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Objective algorithms for the retrieval of optical depths from ground-based measurements. , 1994, Applied optics.

[23]  B. Forgan,et al.  General method for calibrating Sun photometers. , 1994, Applied optics.

[24]  J. Kerr,et al.  Evidence for Large Upward Trends of Ultraviolet-B Radiation Linked to Ozone Depletion , 1993, Science.

[25]  A. T. Young,et al.  Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. , 1989, Applied optics.

[26]  Richard Perez,et al.  Design and development of a rotating shadowband radiometer solar radiation/daylight network , 1988 .

[27]  Samuel J. Oltmans,et al.  Atlas of the global distribution of total ozone, July 1957 - June 1967 , 1976 .

[28]  V. Derr,et al.  Remote sensing of the lower atmosphere , 1971 .

[29]  F. Kasten,et al.  A new table and approximation formula for the relative optial air mass , 1964 .

[30]  C. Junge,et al.  Air chemistry and radioactivity , 1963 .

[31]  Ernest Vigroux,et al.  Contribution à l'étude expérimentale de l'absorption de l'ozone , 1953 .

[32]  Anders Ångström,et al.  On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and on Dust in the Air , 1929 .