Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means

The requirement to mitigate impacts to wetlands and streams is a frequently misunderstood policy with a long and complicated history. We narrate the history of mitigation since the inception of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit program in 1972, through struggles between the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Army Corps of Engineers, through the emerging importance of wetland conservation on the American political landscape, and through the rise of market-based approaches to environmental policy. Mitigation, as it is understood today, was not initially foreseen as a component of the Section 404 permitting program, but was adapted from 1978 regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality as a way of replacing the functions of filled wetlands where permit denials were unlikely. EPA and the Corps agreed in 1990 to define mitigation as the three steps of avoidance, minimization, and compensation, principles which must be applied to permit decisions in the form of the environmental criteria in EPA’s 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Through the 1980s and 1990s, the compensation component of mitigation has become nearly the sole focus of mitigation policy development, and has been the subject of numerous guidance documents and memoranda since 1990. Avoidance and minimization have received far less policy attention, and this lack of policy development may represent a missed opportunity to implement effective wetland conservation.

[1]  R. Sharitz,et al.  Freshwater wetlands and wildlife , 1989 .

[2]  M. Blumm,et al.  Federal Wetlands Protection Under the Clean Water Act: Regulatory Ambivalence, Intergovernmental Tension, and a Call for Reform , 1989 .

[3]  Douglas J. Spieles Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation wetland banks of the United States , 2005, Wetlands.

[4]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[5]  B. Obama,et al.  Office of the Press Secretary , 2009 .

[6]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mitigation Banking in Florida: Ecological Success and Compliance with Permit Criteria , 2007 .

[7]  J. Boyd Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act , 2002 .

[8]  Morgan M. Robertson,et al.  Evaluation of a Market in Wetland Credits: Entrepreneurial Wetland Banking in Chicago , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Margaret S. Race,et al.  Fixing Compensatory Mitigation: What Will it Take? , 1996 .

[10]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[11]  R. Brumbaugh,et al.  National Wetland Mitigation Banking Study: First Phase Report. Phase 1. , 1994 .

[12]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. , 1990 .

[13]  Donna R. Christie,et al.  Coastal zone development: Mitigation, marsh creation, and decision-making , 1982 .

[14]  L. Shabman,et al.  National wetland mitigation banking study. Expanding opportunities for successful mitigation: The private credit market alternative , 1994 .

[15]  Morgan M. Robertson Emerging ecosystem service markets: trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking , 2006 .

[16]  James E. Salzman,et al.  The Effects of Wetland Mitigation Banking on People , 2006 .