The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other?

This paper investigates under what conditions a good corporate social responsibility (CSR) can compensate for a relatively poor corporate ability (CA) (quality), and vice versa. The authors conducted an experiment among business administration students, in which information about a financial services company’s CA and CSR was provided. Participants indicated their preferences for the company’s products, stocks, and jobs. The results show that for stock and job preferences, a poor CA can be compensated by a good CSR. For product preferences, a poor CA could not be compensated by a good CSR, at least when people thought that CA is personally relevant to them. Furthermore, a poor CSR could be compensated by a good CA for product, stocks, and job preferences.

[1]  R. Lazarus.  Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[2]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Delay of consequences and the riskiness of decisions1 , 1973 .

[3]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[4]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[5]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[6]  B. Rosen,et al.  Effects of employment-at-will policies and compensation policies on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. , 1989 .

[7]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[8]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[9]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .

[12]  W. Jones,et al.  Just Say No to Traditional Student Samples , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[14]  Joel R. Evans,et al.  The value of online surveys , 2005, Internet Res..

[15]  Michael A. Kamins,et al.  Effects of Information About Firms’ Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers’ Attitudes , 1999 .

[16]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility , 2001 .

[17]  Marylyn Carrigan,et al.  The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? , 2001 .

[18]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  Conducting Measurement Validation with Experimental Data: Cautions and Recommendations , 2003 .

[19]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? , 2000 .

[20]  John G. Lynch.  Why additive utility models fail as descriptions of choice behavior , 1979 .

[21]  R. Batra,et al.  When Corporate Image Affects Product Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk , 2004 .

[22]  Alan Nash,et al.  Foundations of information integration , 2006 .

[23]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Attribute Identities Matter: Subjective Perceptions of Attribute Characteristics , 2000 .

[24]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[25]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[26]  María del Mar García de los Salmones,et al.  Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Loyalty and Valuation of Services , 2005 .

[27]  Karl Heiner,et al.  Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness , 2002 .

[28]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? , 2003 .

[29]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce , 2000 .

[30]  Stephen J. Arnold,et al.  The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment , 1999 .

[31]  Karen E. Schnietz,et al.  MEASURING THE COST OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND LABOR PROTESTS TO GLOBALIZATION: An Event Study of the Failed 1999 Seattle WTO Talks , 2002 .

[32]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Using the Internet for Market Research: A Study of Private Trading on the Internet , 1999 .

[33]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing , 1983 .

[34]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[35]  J. Jacoby,et al.  The Components of Perceived Risk , 1972 .

[36]  R. Madrigal.  The Role of Corporate Associations in New Product Evaluation , 2000 .

[37]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[38]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[39]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[40]  J. Aaker,et al.  Additivity versus attenuation : the role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity , 1997 .

[41]  R. Ferber.  Research By Convenience , 1977 .

[42]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[43]  R. Dawes.  SOCIAL SELECTION BASED ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[44]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Testing treatment by covariate interactions when treatment varies within subjects. , 1996 .