Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design

As buildings have become larger and house more people, political and societal issues have become more complex, and risks associated with occupying buildings have changed. In particular, since the terrorist attacks of 2001, the anxiety levels and perceived risks of building occupants especially occupants of tall, high-profile buildings have increased. These perceived risks include risks of terrorist attacks, natural disasters, the possibility of bomb threats, and catastrophic fires. The public's perception of risk is already incorporated into building design codes and performance-based design PBD methods for such hazards as earthquakes and fires—explicitly in some cases, implicitly in others. Risk perception will clearly need to be addressed in the design of buildings, as trade-offs in "acceptable" risk versus cost must be made. As terrorism represents a constantly changing design challenge, and is a target-specific hazard, as opposed to a location-specific hazard, it seems unlikely that prescriptive code requirements will be entirely effective at addressing this hazard. PBD codes are a promising approach for design issues that deal with such "cutting-edge" concepts.

[1]  Gregory B. Baecher,et al.  Infrastructure Issues for Cities—Countering Terrorist Threat , 2003 .

[2]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Integrating human factors issues into engineered fire safety design , 1999 .

[3]  Clark McCauley,et al.  Psychological issues in understanding terrorism and the response to terrorism. , 2002 .

[4]  B John Garrick Perspectives on the use of risk assessment to address terrorism. , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[6]  Stephanie A. King,et al.  Earthquake and Terrorism Risk Assessment: Similarities and Differences , 2003 .

[7]  C. Sunstein Terrorism and Probability Neglect , 2003 .

[8]  Brian J. Meacham An Introduction to Performance-Based Fire Safety Analysis and Design with Applications to Structural Fire Safety , 1997 .

[9]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Political decisions and public risk perception , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Terrorism as Hazard: A New Species of Trouble , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk , 2005 .

[12]  Dave Egan,et al.  What are We Afraid Of? , 2002, Ecological Restoration.

[13]  J. Y. Richard Liew Performance Based Fire Safety Design of Structures — A Multi-Dimensional Integration , 2004 .

[14]  Jamshid Mohammadi,et al.  Performance-Based Design Approach in Seismic Analysis of Bridges , 2001 .

[15]  Peter Johnson The process of fire safety design—development ofFire Engineering Guidelines in Australia , 1996 .

[16]  Rachel Becker,et al.  Comparison of the Systems Approach and the Nordic Model and their Melded Application in the Development of Performance-Based Building Codes and Standards , 2001 .

[17]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building fire safety code development , 2000 .

[18]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development , 2001 .

[19]  M Thirion [What are we afraid of?]. , 1989, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[20]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Implementation of performance-based fire codes , 1999 .

[21]  J. David Cummins,et al.  Optimal Insurance With Divergent Beliefs About Insurer Total Default Risk , 2003 .

[22]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[23]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Public Support For Earthquake Risk Mitigation In Portland, Oregon , 1999 .

[24]  Peter J. May MAKING CHOICES ABOUT EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE , 2004 .